Egil Asprem
- Philosophy top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Health top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Topics
- Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (26 papers)Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (9 papers)Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (5 papers)
- Cited by
- PhilosophyHealthGeneral Psychology
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of the History of the Behavioral SciencesPsychology of Religion and Spirituality
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsSweden
In The Last Decade
Egil Asprem
32 papers receiving 315 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Philosophy 177
- Sociology and Political Science 164
- Social Psychology 84
- Health 79
- Clinical Psychology 49
Countries citing papers authored by Egil Asprem
This map shows the geographic impact of Egil Asprem's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Egil Asprem with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Egil Asprem more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Egil Asprem
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Egil Asprem. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Egil Asprem. The network helps show where Egil Asprem may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Egil Asprem
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Egil Asprem. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Egil Asprem based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Egil Asprem. Egil Asprem is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 21 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | Ethnographies of the Esoteric : Introducing Anthropological Methods and Theories to the Study of Contemporary Esotericism | 6 |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | Explanation and the Study of Religion | 2 |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | Esotericism and the Scholastic Imagination : The Origins of Esoteric Practice in Christian Kataphatic Spirituality | 2 |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 38 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | Beyond the West: Towards a New Comparativism in the Study of Esotericism | 19 |
| 14 | 29 | |
| 15 | 26 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 9 | |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Egil Asprem
Egil Asprem is a scholar working on Philosophy, Archeology and Health, having authored 41 papers that have together received 376 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (26 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (9 papers) and Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (177 citations), Health (79 citations) and General Psychology (9 citations). Egil Asprem has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Ann Taves, Asbjørn Dyrendal, Elliott Ihm, David Robertson and Wouter J. Hanegraaff. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences and Psychology of Religion and Spirituality.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.