Rita Mae Kelly

950 citations
44 papers · 670 indexed · h-index 14

Rita Mae Kelly

41 papers receiving 539 citations

Peers

Rita Mae Kelly
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Public Administration 178
  • Gender Studies 299
  • Political Science and International Relations 195
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 76
  • Sociology and Political Science 217
Replace R. M. Blackburn with:
R. M. Blackburn United Kingdom
Margaret Thornton Australia
Jackie Krasas Rogers United States
Paul Bagguley United Kingdom
Nina Toren Israel
Wilbur C. Rich United States
Fiona Colgan United Kingdom
Gail M. McGuire United States
Rebecca E. Klatch United States
Susan Sturm United States
Rita Mae Kelly relative to R. M. Blackburn United Kingdom R. M. Blackburn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
R. M. Blackburn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rita Mae Kelly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rita Mae Kelly's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rita Mae Kelly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rita Mae Kelly more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rita Mae Kelly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rita Mae Kelly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rita Mae Kelly. The network helps show where Rita Mae Kelly may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Rita Mae Kelly, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rita Mae Kelly Line = papers co-authored together Rita Mae Kelly links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
Gender, Globalization, and Democratization
200134
2
The Job Network Is it working
19991
3 199817
4 19988
5
A DEMONSTRATION OF STONE MATRIX ASPHALT MIX DESIGNS USING HIGH POLISH VALUE CRUSHED STONE
19971
6 19933
7
Advances in policy studies since 1950
199238
8 199225
9 199116
10 199117
11 19889
12 19871
13 19850
14 19837
15 19829
16 197913
17 19784
18
Community control of economic development: The boards of directors of community development corporations
19777
19 19753
20 19703

About Rita Mae Kelly

Rita Mae Kelly is a scholar working on Public Administration, Gender Studies and General Psychology, having authored 44 papers that have together received 670 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender Politics and Representation (8 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (5 papers), Social and Cultural Dynamics (3 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (3 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (3 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (2 papers) and Political Science Research and Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (178 citations), Gender Studies (299 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (195 citations). Rita Mae Kelly has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Meredith A. Newman, William N. Dunn, Lorand B. Szalay, Kimberly Fisher, Georgia Duerst-Lahti, Cathy Johnson, Mary E. Guy, Nancy Felipe Russo, Michelle A. Saint‐Germain and Lauren Langman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Women Politics & Policy, Journal of Social Issues, American Political Science Review, Sex Roles and PS Political Science & Politics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026