Rita Mae Kelly

41 papers receiving 539 citations

Peers

Rita Mae Kelly
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Gender Studies 299
  • Sociology and Political Science 217
  • Political Science and International Relations 195
  • Public Administration 178
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 76
Replace R. M. Blackburn with:
R. M. Blackburn United Kingdom
Margaret Thornton Australia
Jackie Krasas Rogers United States
Paul Bagguley United Kingdom
Nina Toren Israel
Wilbur C. Rich United States
Fiona Colgan United Kingdom
Gail M. McGuire United States
Rebecca E. Klatch United States
Susan Sturm United States
Rita Mae Kelly relative to R. M. Blackburn United Kingdom R. M. Blackburn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
R. M. Blackburn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rita Mae Kelly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rita Mae Kelly's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rita Mae Kelly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rita Mae Kelly more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rita Mae Kelly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rita Mae Kelly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rita Mae Kelly. The network helps show where Rita Mae Kelly may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rita Mae Kelly

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rita Mae Kelly. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rita Mae Kelly based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rita Mae Kelly. Rita Mae Kelly is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
Gender, Globalization, and Democratization
34
2
The Job Network Is it working
1
3 17
4 8
5
A DEMONSTRATION OF STONE MATRIX ASPHALT MIX DESIGNS USING HIGH POLISH VALUE CRUSHED STONE
1
6 3
7
Advances in policy studies since 1950
38
8 25
9 16
10 17
11 9
12 1
13 0
14 7
15 9
16 13
17 4
18
Community control of economic development: The boards of directors of community development corporations
7
19 3
20 3

About Rita Mae Kelly

Rita Mae Kelly is a scholar working on Public Administration, Gender Studies and General Psychology, having authored 44 papers that have together received 670 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender Politics and Representation (8 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (5 papers) and Social and Cultural Dynamics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (178 citations), Gender Studies (299 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (195 citations). Rita Mae Kelly has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Meredith A. Newman, William N. Dunn, Lorand B. Szalay, Kimberly Fisher, Georgia Duerst-Lahti, Cathy Johnson, Mary E. Guy, Nancy Felipe Russo, Michelle A. Saint‐Germain and Lauren Langman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Administrative Science Quarterly and American Political Science Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026