Richard Young

2.7k citations
98 papers · 1.6k indexed · h-index 15

Richard Young

81 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Richard Young
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
  • General Decision Sciences 67
  • Safety Research 302
  • Accounting 301
  • Management Information Systems 158
  • Parasitology 79
Replace Xiao‐Ping Chen with:
Xiao‐Ping Chen China
Stephen J. Kraus United States
Kevin M. Devine Ireland
Robert M. Rosenbaum United States
Karen E. James United States
Robert J. Kelly United States
Sebastian Kube Germany
Charles T. Salmon France
Deborah Wilson United Kingdom
G. C. ASHTON United States
Richard Young relative to Xiao‐Ping Chen China Xiao‐Ping Chen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.2×
Xiao‐Ping Chen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Young

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Young's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Young with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Young more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Young

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Young. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Young. The network helps show where Richard Young may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Richard Young, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard Young Line = papers co-authored together Richard Young links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20220
2 20220
3 20175
4 20120
5 20100
6
Structured Finance and Mark-to-Model Accounting: A Few Simple Illustrations
20100
7 20076
8 20070
9 20077
10
The Effect of Honesty Preferences and Superior Authority on Budget Proposals
200512
11
Management Control Using Non-Binding Budgetary Announcements
20048
12 200031
13
Access to criminal justice
199611
14 19961
15
The Administration of Benefits in Britain: Adjudication Officers and the Influence of Social Security Appeal Tribunals
19922
16 1990395
17 1989402
18 19805
19
Gil Vicente's Castilian Debut
19721
20
The Middle East, oil, and the great powers, 1959
19591

About Richard Young

Richard Young is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Safety Research and Accounting, having authored 98 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (24 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (19 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (16 papers), International Maritime Law Issues (9 papers), Accounting and Organizational Management (8 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (7 papers), Arctic and Russian Policy Studies (6 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (67 citations), Safety Research (302 citations) and Accounting (301 citations). Richard Young has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Timothy Elliott, Steven T. Schwartz, Frederick W. Rankin, H. Lauterpacht, L. Oppenheim, Anil Arya, Andrew Sanders, Mandy Burton, Jonathan Glover and Eric E. Spires. Their work appears in journals such as Cell, Annual Review of Immunology and American Journal of Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026