Citations per year, relative to Andrew Sanders Andrew Sanders (= 1×)
peers
Geoff Ward
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Sanders
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Sanders's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Sanders with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Sanders more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Sanders. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Sanders. The network helps show where Andrew Sanders may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Sanders
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Sanders.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Sanders based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Sanders. Andrew Sanders is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Skinns, Layla, et al.. (2021). Sanders & Young's criminal justice, 5th Edition. Oxford University Press eBooks.
Sanders, Andrew. (2001). Community justice : modernising the magistracy in England and Wales. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique).5 indexed citations
Sanders, Andrew. (1996). Prosecution in Common Law jurisdictions. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).1 indexed citations
8.
Sanders, Andrew. (1995). The reception of Western law in Japan. Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa. 28(2). 280–288.1 indexed citations
9.
Sanders, Andrew, et al.. (1991). The case for the prosecution. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).102 indexed citations
10.
Sanders, Andrew. (1990). Sekgoma Letsholathebe's detention and the betrayal of a protectorate. Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa. 23(3). 348–360.
11.
Sanders, Andrew. (1987). How customary is African customary law. Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa. 1(1). 15–18.4 indexed citations
12.
Sanders, Andrew, et al.. (1987). The internal conflict of laws in Lesotho. Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa. 20(3). 377–404.1 indexed citations
13.
Sanders, Andrew. (1986). A bill of rights for South Africa. 1(1). 1–8.
14.
Sanders, Andrew. (1985). The Internal Conflict of Laws in Botswana. Botswana notes and records. 17(1). 77–88.1 indexed citations
Sanders, Andrew. (1983). Constitutionalism in Botswana: a valiant attempt at judicial activism. Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa. 16(3). 350–373.3 indexed citations
17.
Sanders, Andrew. (1982). On African socialism and the rule of law. Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa. 15(3). 299–305.3 indexed citations
18.
Sanders, Andrew. (1981). The characteristic features of Southern African Law. Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa. 14(3). 328–335.1 indexed citations
19.
Sanders, Andrew. (1981). The characteristic features of the Civil Law. Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa. 14(2). 196–207.1 indexed citations
20.
Sanders, Andrew. (1978). On African socialism and natural law thinking. Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa. 11(1). 68–75.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.