Political Science and International Relations21.0k
Law4.2k
Development1.5k
Strategy and Management5.3k
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law4.0k
Replace Antipode with:
AntipodeUnited States
Progress in Human GeographyUnited Kingdom
The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social ScienceUnited States
The International Journal of African Historical StudiesUnited States
Pacific AffairsUnited States
GeoforumUnited Kingdom
Transactions of the Institute of British GeographersUnited Kingdom
Political GeographyUnited Kingdom
Hispanic American Historical ReviewUnited States
International Journal of Urban and Regional ResearchUnited States
American Journal of International Lawrelative toAntipodeUnited StatesAntipode's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.0×
Antipode · 1×
×1.121k/18kPSIR
×4.04k/1kLAW
×1.22k/1kDEVEL
×1.45k/4kSM
×1.24k/3kMMPL
Citations per year
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in American Journal of International Law
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in American Journal of International Law. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in American Journal of International Law with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites American Journal of International Law more than expected).
Fields of papers published in American Journal of International Law
This network shows the impact of papers published in American Journal of International Law. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in American Journal of International Law.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.