Richard Roberts
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Neurology top 1%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 1%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- A. David MilnerMonika HarveyRustam Al‐Shahi SalmanMichael D. RuggR. J. SellarVaughn RitchieVakis PapanastassiouCharles Warlow
- Topics
- Epilepsy research and treatment (11 papers)Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment (10 papers)Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Richard Roberts
58 papers receiving 3.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.2k
- Neurology 1.0k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 892
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 382
- Molecular Biology 331
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Roberts
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Roberts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Roberts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Roberts more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Roberts
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Roberts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Roberts. The network helps show where Richard Roberts may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Roberts
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Roberts. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Roberts based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Roberts. Richard Roberts is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40 | |
| 2 | 236 | |
| 3 | 84 | |
| 4 | 50 | |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | 27 | |
| 7 | 21 | |
| 8 | 90 | |
| 9 | 20 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 19 | |
| 12 | 204 | |
| 13 | 50 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 47 | |
| 16 | 46 | |
| 17 | 231 | |
| 18 | Leftward underestimation of linear size in patients with visuospatial neglect | 1 |
| 19 | 96 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Richard Roberts
Richard Roberts is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience and Neurology, having authored 60 papers that have together received 3.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epilepsy research and treatment (11 papers), Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment (10 papers) and Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (1.0k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.2k citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (892 citations). Richard Roberts has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include A. David Milner, Monika Harvey, Rustam Al‐Shahi Salman, Michael D. Rugg, R. J. Sellar, Vaughn Ritchie, Vakis Papanastassiou, Charles Warlow, Jo J. Bhattacharya and Donald R. Helinski. Their work appears in journals such as Brain, Neurology and Stroke.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.