Jon Stone

18.1k total citations · 3 hit papers
272 papers, 10.0k citations indexed

About

Jon Stone is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Philosophy and Neurology. According to data from OpenAlex, Jon Stone has authored 272 papers receiving a total of 10.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 192 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 98 papers in Philosophy and 69 papers in Neurology. Recurrent topics in Jon Stone's work include Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (185 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (96 papers) and Neurology and Historical Studies (60 papers). Jon Stone is often cited by papers focused on Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (185 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (96 papers) and Neurology and Historical Studies (60 papers). Jon Stone collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Jon Stone's co-authors include Alan Carson, Michael Sharpe, Mark J. Edwards, Charles Warlow, Laura McWhirter, Jeannette Gelauff, Stoyan Popkirov, Mark Hallett, Selma Aybek and Jeffrey P. Staab and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Jon Stone

259 papers receiving 9.6k citations

Hit Papers

Current Concepts in Diagnosis and Treatment of Functional... 2018 2026 2020 2023 2018 2018 2022 100 200 300 400

Peers

Jon Stone
Comparison fields: 5 of 164
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 7.6k
  • Philosophy 3.5k
  • Clinical Psychology 2.6k
  • Neurology 2.0k
  • Neurology 1.6k
Replace Alan Carson with:
Alan Carson United Kingdom
Laura H. Goldstein United Kingdom
Peter Henningsen Germany
Timothy R. Nicholson United Kingdom
Robert F. Asarnow United States
Kjetil Sundet Norway
R. Leiguarda Argentina
Massimo Biondi Italy
Ulrik Fredrik Malt Norway
Juha Veijola Finland
Alan Carson United Kingdom View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Jon Stone
Jon Stone · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Jon Stone
Jon Stone · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Jon Stone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jon Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jon Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jon Stone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jon Stone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jon Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jon Stone. The network helps show where Jon Stone may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jon Stone

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jon Stone. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jon Stone based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jon Stone. Jon Stone is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 3
5 12
6 3
7 26
8 8
9 6
10 64
11 6
12 40
13 3
14 11
15 76
16 184
17
Functional weakness: Why weakness and not some other symptom? The role of panic, dissociation, pain, and physical injury in onset
1
18
Spinocerebellar ataxia type 8 in Scotland
1
19 4
20
The assessment of antichymotrypsin in cancer monitoring.
20

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026