Ruth E. Mark

2.7k total citations · 1 hit paper
56 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

Ruth E. Mark is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience and Rehabilitation. According to data from OpenAlex, Ruth E. Mark has authored 56 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 13 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 8 papers in Rehabilitation. Recurrent topics in Ruth E. Mark's work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (19 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (8 papers) and Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (5 papers). Ruth E. Mark is often cited by papers focused on Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (19 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (8 papers) and Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (5 papers). Ruth E. Mark collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Belgium. Ruth E. Mark's co-authors include Michael D. Rugg, Astrid M. Schloerscheidt, Margriet M. Sitskoorn, Peter Walla, Kevin Allan, Paul L.M. de Kort, Inge Bongers, Liselore Snaphaan, Richard Roberts and Willem J. Kop and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Brain.

In The Last Decade

Ruth E. Mark

54 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Hit Papers

Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and exp... 1998 2026 2007 2016 1998 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ruth E. Mark Netherlands 22 1.0k 560 279 219 217 56 2.0k
Tania Giovannetti United States 32 1.1k 1.1× 1.5k 2.7× 347 1.2× 369 1.7× 235 1.1× 118 2.8k
Daniel C. Mograbi Brazil 25 728 0.7× 1.1k 1.9× 174 0.6× 228 1.0× 121 0.6× 120 1.9k
Amy D. Rodriguez United States 26 1.2k 1.2× 253 0.5× 258 0.9× 173 0.8× 188 0.9× 87 1.9k
José A. Periáñez Spain 13 995 1.0× 646 1.2× 112 0.4× 308 1.4× 217 1.0× 38 2.1k
Marsha J. Polk United States 24 1000 1.0× 1.3k 2.3× 148 0.5× 259 1.2× 103 0.5× 32 2.6k
Sabina Brennan Ireland 14 762 0.7× 704 1.3× 167 0.6× 323 1.5× 62 0.3× 31 2.5k
Vonetta M. Dotson United States 26 778 0.8× 717 1.3× 114 0.4× 426 1.9× 134 0.6× 71 2.0k
Sharpley Hsieh Australia 27 1.2k 1.2× 1.5k 2.8× 241 0.9× 181 0.8× 89 0.4× 37 3.0k
David G. Loughrey Ireland 9 734 0.7× 575 1.0× 138 0.5× 273 1.2× 57 0.3× 14 2.2k
Daniel Adrover‐Roig Spain 16 913 0.9× 492 0.9× 108 0.4× 271 1.2× 161 0.7× 46 1.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth E. Mark

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth E. Mark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth E. Mark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth E. Mark more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth E. Mark

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth E. Mark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth E. Mark. The network helps show where Ruth E. Mark may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth E. Mark

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth E. Mark. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth E. Mark based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth E. Mark. Ruth E. Mark is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Snaphaan, Liselore, et al.. (2024). The Effects of Neuropsychiatric Symptom Clusters in People with Dementia on Family Caregiver Burden. Journal of Alzheimer s Disease. 100(4). 1289–1298. 1 indexed citations
3.
Wildiers, Hans, Mercedes Almela, Ruth E. Mark, et al.. (2023). A Systematic Review on the Potential Acceleration of Neurocognitive Aging in Older Cancer Survivors. Cancers. 15(4). 1215–1215. 13 indexed citations
4.
Mark, Ruth E., et al.. (2022). Influence of Sense of Competence, Empathy and Relationship Quality on Burden in Dementia Caregivers: A 15 Months Longitudinal Study. Journal of Applied Gerontology. 42(3). 464–473. 4 indexed citations
5.
Mark, Ruth E., et al.. (2022). Can subjective cognitive complaints at three months post stroke predict alteration in information processing speed during the first year?. Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition. 30(3). 472–485. 1 indexed citations
6.
Mark, Ruth E., et al.. (2020). Motor Impairment Three Months Post Stroke Implies A Corresponding Cognitive Deficit. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases. 29(10). 105119–105119. 12 indexed citations
7.
Snaphaan, Liselore, et al.. (2020). The Trajectory of Caregiver Burden and Risk Factors in Dementia Progression: A Systematic Review. Journal of Alzheimer s Disease. 77(3). 1107–1115. 94 indexed citations
8.
Mark, Ruth E., et al.. (2020). Course and Predictors of Subjective Cognitive Complaints During the First 12 Months after Stroke. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases. 29(3). 104588–104588. 15 indexed citations
9.
Mark, Ruth E., et al.. (2019). The Applicability and Effect of EMDR in a Patient With a Mild Stage of Alzheimer's Disease. Journal of EMDR Practice and Research. 13(1). 51–60. 8 indexed citations
10.
Bongers, Inge, et al.. (2018). User-Driven Living Lab for Assistive Technology to Support People With Dementia Living at Home: Protocol for Developing Co-Creation–Based Innovations. JMIR Research Protocols. 8(1). e10952–e10952. 20 indexed citations
11.
Mark, Ruth E., et al.. (2018). Empathy in informal dementia caregivers and its relationship with depression, anxiety, and burden. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology. 19(1). 12–21. 63 indexed citations
13.
Mark, Ruth E., et al.. (2014). Short-Term Cognitive Effects After Recovery From a Delirium in a Hospitalized Elderly Sample. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 202(10). 732–737. 2 indexed citations
14.
Mark, Ruth E.. (2012). Understanding the individual with Alzheimer’s disease: Can socioemotional selectivity theory guide us?. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 1(3). 77–86. 8 indexed citations
15.
Oldenbeuving, Annemarie W., et al.. (2011). Delirium in acute stroke: A predictor of subsequent cognitive impairment?. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 306(1-2). 138–142. 28 indexed citations
16.
Mark, Ruth E.. (2011). Healthy Aging as Disease?. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. 3. 3–3. 7 indexed citations
17.
Mark, Ruth E.. (2009). Diagnosing Alzheimer's dementia in Down syndrome: Problems and possible solutions. Research in Developmental Disabilities. 30(5). 827–838. 91 indexed citations
18.
Mark, Ruth E., et al.. (2008). Delay Discounting and Pathological Gambling. 2(2). 1. 1 indexed citations
19.
Rugg, Michael D., et al.. (1998). Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory. Nature. 392(6676). 595–598. 594 indexed citations breakdown →
20.
Rugg, Michael D., et al.. (1997). ERP repetition effects in indirect and direct tasks: Effects of age and interitem lag. Psychophysiology. 34(5). 572–586. 90 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026