Richard Lewis
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes 15
- Health Services Management and Policy 8
- Global Health Care Issues 6
- Interprofessional Education and Collaboration 6
- Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes 4
- Emergency Medical Services top 10%
- Pharmacy top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Healthcare Policy and Management 18
-
- Healthcare innovation and challenges 9
-
- Chronic Disease Management Strategies 7
Richard Lewis
41 papers receiving 450 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- General Health Professions 344
- Health Information Management 43
- Emergency Medical Services 41
- Pharmacy 28
- Economics and Econometrics 154
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Lewis
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Lewis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Lewis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Lewis. The network helps show where Richard Lewis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Richard Lewis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 45 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 60 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 27 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 8 | Strategy will knit up the ravelled sleeve of care. | 2008 | 1 |
| 9 | Social Enterprise and Community- based Care Is there a future for mutually owned organisations in community and primary care? | 2006 | 7 |
| 10 | 2005 | 31 | |
| 11 | 2005 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 24 | |
| 13 | 2004 | 86 | |
| 14 | 2003 | 10 | |
| 15 | 2001 | 7 | |
| 16 | Doctors' pay. What seems to be the trouble? | 2000 | 1 |
| 17 | 1999 | 3 | |
| 18 | 1994 | 17 | |
| 19 | CITIZENS V. ATOMIC POWER. | 1972 | 1 |
| 20 | Structure of the Elk Ridge-Needles Area, San Juan County, Utah | 1958 | 1 |
About Richard Lewis
Richard Lewis is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics and Health Information Management, having authored 44 papers that have together received 511 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Policy and Management (18 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (15 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (9 papers), Health Services Management and Policy (8 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (7 papers), Global Health Care Issues (6 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (6 papers) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (344 citations), Health Information Management (43 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (41 citations). Richard Lewis has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Tom Ling, Judith Smith, Martín Roland, Lisa Hinton, Martin Bardsley, John Adams, Nicholas Mays, Stephen Gillam, John Appleby and Steve Gillam. Their work appears in journals such as USGS professional paper, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine and Ageing and Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.