Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals
This map shows the geographic impact of Judith Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Judith Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Judith Smith more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Judith Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Judith Smith. The network helps show where Judith Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Judith Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Judith Smith.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Judith Smith based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Judith Smith. Judith Smith is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Smith, Judith, et al.. (2009). Beyond the Book: Using VoiceThread in Language Arts Instruction. E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education. 2009(1). 712–715.4 indexed citations
8.
Glasby, Jon, Judith Smith, & Helen Dickinson. (2006). Creating 'NHS Local': A new relationship between PCTs and local government?. British Journal of Healthcare Management. 12(12).10 indexed citations
9.
Gribben, Barry, Margaret Horsburgh, Bridie Kent, et al.. (2005). Evaluation of the implementation and intermediate outcomes of the Primary Health Care Strategy : first report. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University).6 indexed citations
10.
Smith, Judith, et al.. (2005). Will PCTs be open for business?. PubMed. 115(5981). 16–7.1 indexed citations
Smith, Judith & Kieran Walshe. (2004). Big Business: The Corporatization of Primary Care in the UK and the USA. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
13.
Carville, Kylie & Judith Smith. (2004). A Report on the Effectiveness of Comprehensive Wound Assessment and Documentation in the Community. 12(1). 41.32 indexed citations
14.
Goodwin, Nick & Judith Smith. (2002). PCT commissioning. About the size of it.. PubMed. 112(5831). 22–5.1 indexed citations
15.
Walshe, Kieran & Judith Smith. (2001). NHS reorganisation. Cause and effect.. PubMed. 111(5776). 20–3.4 indexed citations
16.
Smith, Judith, K. Knight, & Fiona Wilson. (1999). Primary care groups. Supra troupers.. PubMed. 109(5637). 26–8.2 indexed citations
17.
Wright, Anthony, et al.. (1992). An evaluation of mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia in patients with lateral epicondylalgia. The Pain Clinic. 5(4). 221–227.27 indexed citations
18.
Smith, Judith, et al.. (1983). Learning about Reading, Writing and Fish with the Help of a Word Processor.. 6(4).1 indexed citations
19.
Smith, Judith. (1983). The idea of health : implications for the nursing professional. Teachers College Press eBooks.9 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.