Richard H. Shryock

1.6k citations
42 papers · 371 indexed · h-index 12

Richard H. Shryock

34 papers receiving 220 citations

Peers

Richard H. Shryock
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • General Psychology 16
  • History 78
  • History and Philosophy of Science 17
  • Research and Theory 3
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 4
Replace Patrice Pinell with:
Patrice Pinell France
Griselda Rowntree United Kingdom
Mary G. Winkler United States
Pope John Paul
Thomas A. Shannon United States
Jane Russo Brazil
Vincente Navarro Netherlands
Sarah Franklin United States
Eugenia Georges United States
Robert Cliquet Belgium
Richard H. Shryock relative to Patrice Pinell France Patrice Pinell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Patrice Pinell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard H. Shryock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard H. Shryock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard H. Shryock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard H. Shryock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard H. Shryock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard H. Shryock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard H. Shryock. The network helps show where Richard H. Shryock may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Richard H. Shryock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard H. Shryock Line = papers co-authored together Richard H. Shryock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 19726
2 19671
3 196727
4 196714
5
A Short History of Medicine.
19661
6 19654
7 19632
8 19623
9 19621
10 19617
11 196129
12 19592
13 19592
14 19561
15 19550
16 19553
17 19556
18
The Interplay of Social and Internal Factors in the History of Modern Medicine
19532
19
The unique influence of the Johns-Hopkins University on American medicine.
19537
20 19511

About Richard H. Shryock

Richard H. Shryock is a scholar working on History, History and Philosophy of Science, Anatomy, Marketing and Clinical Psychology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 371 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medical History and Innovations (12 papers), Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (4 papers), History of Science and Medicine (4 papers), Historical Medical Research and Treatments (2 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (2 papers), American History and Culture (2 papers), History of Medicine Studies (2 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (16 citations), History (78 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (17 citations), Research and Theory (3 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (4 citations). Richard H. Shryock has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include David L. Cowen, Jack P. Greene, Donald R. McNeil, Gerald N. Grob, John Duffy, Whitfield J. Bell, George W. Adams, James H. Cassedy, Donald Fleming and John Duffy. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The William and Mary Quarterly, The New England Quarterly, Isis and American Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026