Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
New Rules of Sociological Method: A Positive Critique of Interpretative Sociologies
1978603 citationsRichard Grathoff, Anthony GiddensThe Canadian Journal of Sociologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Grathoff
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Grathoff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Grathoff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Grathoff more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Grathoff
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Grathoff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Grathoff. The network helps show where Richard Grathoff may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Grathoff
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Grathoff.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Grathoff based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Grathoff. Richard Grathoff is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Schütz, Alfred, et al.. (2009). Zur Kritik der Phänomenologie Edmund Husserls.1 indexed citations
2.
Znaniecki, Florian, et al.. (1997). What Are Sociological Problems. Medical Entomology and Zoology.1 indexed citations
Grathoff, Richard. (1989). Milieu und Lebenswelt : Einführung in die phänomenologische Soziologie und die sozialphänomenologische Forschung. Suhrkamp eBooks.8 indexed citations
7.
Grathoff, Richard, Bernhard Waldenfels, Aron Gurwitsch, & Alfred Schütz. (1986). Sozialität und Intersubjektivität.3 indexed citations
8.
Grathoff, Richard & Bernhard Waldenfels. (1983). Sozialität und Intersubjektivität : phänomenologische Perspektiven der Sozialwissenschaften im Umkreis von Aron Gurwitsch und Alfred Schütz. W. Fink eBooks.6 indexed citations
9.
Grathoff, Richard, et al.. (1979). Alfred Schütz und die Idee des Alltags in den Sozialwissenschaften.12 indexed citations
Coser, Lewis A., Richard Grathoff, & Maurice Natanson. (1979). A Dialogue of the Deaf. Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews. 8(5). 680–680.8 indexed citations
16.
Grathoff, Richard & Anthony Giddens. (1978). New Rules of Sociological Method: A Positive Critique of Interpretative Sociologies. The Canadian Journal of Sociology. 3(3). 374–374.603 indexed citations breakdown →
17.
Grathoff, Richard, et al.. (1976). Maurice Merleau-Ponty und das Problem der Struktur in den Sozialwissenschaften.2 indexed citations
18.
Grathoff, Richard, et al.. (1976). On the Beginning of Social Inquiry.. Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews. 5(3). 354–354.26 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.