Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Alfred Schütz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alfred Schütz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alfred Schütz more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alfred Schütz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alfred Schütz. The network helps show where Alfred Schütz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alfred Schütz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alfred Schütz.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alfred Schütz based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Alfred Schütz. Alfred Schütz is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Schütz, Alfred & Michael Barber. (2013). Literary reality and relationships. Springer eBooks.2 indexed citations
2.
Schütz, Alfred. (2010). O Estrangeiro – Um ensaio em Psicologia Social. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.8 indexed citations
Embree, Lester & Alfred Schütz. (2004). Alfred Schutz's "Sociological Aspect of Literature": Construction and Complementary Essays. Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks.5 indexed citations
8.
Schütz, Alfred, et al.. (2004). Zur Phänomenologie des Alltagswissens.1 indexed citations
9.
Schütz, Alfred, et al.. (2003). Die kommunikative Ordnung der Lebenswelt.6 indexed citations
10.
Schütz, Alfred. (2003). On multiple realities. 3(2). 3–34.
11.
Schütz, Alfred, Martin Endreß, & Ilja Šrubař. (2003). Die pragmatische Schichtung der Lebenswelt.4 indexed citations
12.
Weiss, Gilbert, Éric Voegelin, & Alfred Schütz. (2000). Theorie, Relevanz und Wahrheit : eine Rekonstruktion des Briefwechsels zwischen Eric Voegelin und Alfred Schütz (1938-1959). Bayerische Staatsbibliothek.
13.
Schütz, Alfred, et al.. (1987). Le chercheur et le quotidien : phénoménologie des sciences sociales.50 indexed citations
14.
Schütz, Alfred & Ilja Šrubař. (1981). Theorie der Lebensformen : (frühe Manuskripte aus der Bergson-Periode). Suhrkamp eBooks.4 indexed citations
15.
Schütz, Alfred, et al.. (1977). Talcott Parsons zur Theorie sozialen Handelns : ein Briefwechsel. Suhrkamp eBooks.4 indexed citations
16.
Schütz, Alfred, et al.. (1972). Studien zur soziologischen Theorie.4 indexed citations
17.
Schütz, Alfred, Richard M. Zaner, & Thomas Luckmann. (1971). Das Problem der Relevanz. Suhrkamp eBooks.30 indexed citations
18.
Schütz, Alfred, et al.. (1971). Studien zur phänomenologischen Philosophie.1 indexed citations
19.
Gurwitsch, Aron, et al.. (1971). Das Problem der sozialen Wirklichkeit.35 indexed citations
20.
Schütz, Alfred & Helmut R. Wagner. (1970). On phenomenology and social relations : selected writings. University of Chicago Press eBooks.173 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.