Richard Garner
Impact in
- Mathematical Physics top 5%
- Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
- Algebra and Number Theory top 10%
- Advanced Topics in Algebra
Papers in
-
- Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology 34
-
- Algebraic structures and combinatorial models 26
- Advanced Topology and Set Theory 5
- Co-authors
- Philip J. IvanhoeNicola GambinoMogens Herman HansenStephen LackBenno van den BergMichael ShulmanPhyllis CulhamEmily Riehl
- Journals
- Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra (11 papers)Advances in Mathematics (7 papers)The American Historical Review (4 papers)Theory and applications of categories (4 papers)Theoretical Computer Science (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Richard Garner
46 papers receiving 418 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Mathematical Physics 238
- Algebra and Number Theory 114
- Geometry and Topology 190
- Religious studies 20
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 63
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Garner
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Garner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Garner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Garner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Garner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Garner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Garner. The network helps show where Richard Garner may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Richard Garner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 16 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 0 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 12 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 8 | |
| 17 | 2008 | 7 | |
| 18 | 2008 | 40 | |
| 19 | Double Clubs | 2006 | 4 |
| 20 | 1980 | 7 |
About Richard Garner
Richard Garner is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Geometry and Topology, Algebra and Number Theory, Anthropology and Classics, having authored 54 papers that have together received 503 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (34 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (26 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (12 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (12 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (7 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (6 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (5 papers) and Advanced Topology and Set Theory (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mathematical Physics (238 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (114 citations), Geometry and Topology (190 citations), Religious studies (20 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (63 citations). Richard Garner has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Philip J. Ivanhoe, Nicola Gambino, Mogens Herman Hansen, Stephen Lack, Benno van den Berg, Michael Shulman, Phyllis Culham, Emily Riehl, William G. Thalmann and Pierre-Louis Curien. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra, Advances in Mathematics, The American Historical Review, Theory and applications of categories and Theoretical Computer Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.