Emily Riehl
- Mathematical Physics top 5%
- Geometry and Topology top 2%
- Algebra and Number Theory top 10%
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 10%
- Artificial Intelligence
- Co-authors
- Dominic VerityMichael ShulmanŠimon KosJohn P. D’AngeloTobias BarthelKathryn HessBrooke ShipleyRichard Garner
- Topics
- Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (23 papers)Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (18 papers)Advanced Topics in Algebra (7 papers)
- Journals
- Transactions of the American Mathematical SocietyBulletin of the London Mathematical SocietyBulletin of the American Mathematical Society
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaGermany
In The Last Decade
Emily Riehl
25 papers receiving 266 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
- Mathematical Physics 254
- Geometry and Topology 224
- Algebra and Number Theory 131
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 57
- Artificial Intelligence 45
Countries citing papers authored by Emily Riehl
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Riehl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Riehl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Riehl more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Riehl
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Riehl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Riehl. The network helps show where Emily Riehl may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Riehl
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Riehl. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Riehl based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Riehl. Emily Riehl is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 27 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 21 | |
| 12 | 89 | |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | Algebraic model structures | 21 |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | A LEISURELY INTRODUCTION TO SIMPLICIAL SETS | 1 |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | TWO-SIDED DISCRETE FIBRATIONS IN 2-CATEGORIES AND BICATEGORIES | 2 |
| 20 | 1 |
About Emily Riehl
Emily Riehl is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Geometry and Topology and Algebra and Number Theory, having authored 31 papers that have together received 303 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (23 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (18 papers) and Advanced Topics in Algebra (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Algebra and Number Theory (131 citations), Mathematical Physics (254 citations) and Geometry and Topology (224 citations). Emily Riehl has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Dominic Verity, Michael Shulman, Šimon Kos, John P. D’Angelo, Tobias Barthel, Kathryn Hess, Brooke Shipley, Richard Garner, Andrew J. Blumberg and Nick Gurski. Their work appears in journals such as Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society and Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.