Stephen Lack
Impact in
- Algebra and Number Theory top 2%
- Advanced Topics in Algebra
- Mathematical Physics top 1%
- Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
Papers in
-
- Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology 65
- Advanced Operator Algebra Research 3
-
- Algebraic structures and combinatorial models 51
- Advanced Topology and Set Theory 3
- Co-authors
- Ross Street (13 shared papers)J.R.B. Cockett (3 shared papers)R. F. C. Walters (3 shared papers)A. Carboni (1 shared paper)G. M. Kelly (6 shared papers)Paweł Sobociński (1 shared paper)Jir̆ı́ Rosický (4 shared papers)Alain Bruguières (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Stephen Lack
65 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Algebra and Number Theory 496
- Mathematical Physics 886
- Geometry and Topology 782
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 334
- Software 70
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Lack
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Lack's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Lack with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Lack more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Lack
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Lack. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Lack. The network helps show where Stephen Lack may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 23 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Lack, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 74 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 205 | |
| 2 | 1993 | 141 | |
| 3 | 2002 | 87 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 76 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 49 | |
| 6 | 2002 | 38 | |
| 7 | 2002 | 35 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 34 | |
| 9 | V -CAT IS LOCALLY PRESENTABLE OR LOCALLY BOUNDED IF V IS SO | 2001 | 31 |
| 10 | 2000 | 31 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 29 | |
| 12 | 2006 | 27 | |
| 13 | 2003 | 27 | |
| 14 | 2004 | 27 | |
| 15 | 1997 | 25 | |
| 16 | 2002 | 23 | |
| 17 | 2009 | 23 | |
| 18 | 2007 | 22 | |
| 19 | 2006 | 21 | |
| 20 | 2007 | 21 |
About Stephen Lack
Stephen Lack is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Geometry and Topology, Algebra and Number Theory, Artificial Intelligence and Neurology, having authored 74 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (65 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (51 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (33 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (14 papers), Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications (13 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (5 papers), Advanced Topology and Set Theory (3 papers) and Advanced Operator Algebra Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Algebra and Number Theory (496 citations), Mathematical Physics (886 citations), Geometry and Topology (782 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (334 citations) and Software (70 citations). Stephen Lack has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Hungary and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Ross Street, J.R.B. Cockett, R. F. C. Walters, A. Carboni, G. M. Kelly, Paweł Sobociński, Jir̆ı́ Rosický, Alain Bruguières, Alexis Virelizier and Brian J. Day. Their work appears in journals such as Theory and applications of categories, Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra, Applied Categorical Structures, Advances in Mathematics and Journal of Algebra.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.