Richard Egan
- Equine top 5%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Diversity and Career in Medicine 17
- Nephrology top 10%
- Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments 5
- Surgery top 10%
- Surgical Simulation and Training 12
- Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes 6
- Pharmacy top 10%
-
- Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes 19
-
- Innovations in Medical Education 15
-
- Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout 11
-
- Global Health Workforce Issues 6
- Co-authors
- Wyn G. LewisHoward D. PomeranzTarig AbdelrahmanLuke HopkinsDavid RobinsonJames P. MorganO JamesArfon Powell
- Cited by
- EquineGender StudiesNephrology
- Journals
- Journal of surgical education (8 papers)BJS Open (7 papers)Postgraduate Medical Journal (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Richard Egan
83 papers receiving 756 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
- Equine 22
- Gender Studies 98
- Nephrology 65
- Surgery 310
- Pharmacy 25
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Egan
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Egan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Egan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Egan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Egan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Egan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Egan. The network helps show where Richard Egan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Richard Egan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 17 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 0 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 13 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 0 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 13 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 14 | |
| 19 | 2019 | 15 | |
| 20 | 2018 | 20 |
About Richard Egan
Richard Egan is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Equine and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 93 papers that have together received 812 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (19 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (17 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (15 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (12 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (11 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (6 papers), Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (6 papers) and Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (22 citations), Gender Studies (98 citations) and Nephrology (65 citations). Richard Egan has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Wyn G. Lewis, Howard D. Pomeranz, Tarig Abdelrahman, Luke Hopkins, David Robinson, James P. Morgan, O James, Arfon Powell, David Scott‐Coombes and Chris Brown. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of surgical education, BJS Open, Postgraduate Medical Journal, British journal of surgery and World Journal of Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.