Ian M. Williams

1.6k total citations
92 papers, 978 citations indexed

About

Ian M. Williams is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Ian M. Williams has authored 92 papers receiving a total of 978 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 69 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 48 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and 31 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Ian M. Williams's work include Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (51 papers), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (38 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (23 papers). Ian M. Williams is often cited by papers focused on Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (51 papers), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (38 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (23 papers). Ian M. Williams collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Palestinian Territory and United States. Ian M. Williams's co-authors include Christopher P. Twine, David C. Bosanquet, Damian M. Bailey, James Glasbey, Peter L. Lewis, Stuart G. Ferguson, Matti Jubouri, Sven Z. C. P. Tan, I F Lane and Mohamad Bashir and has published in prestigious journals such as British journal of surgery, Vaccine and Journal of Vascular Surgery.

In The Last Decade

Ian M. Williams

81 papers receiving 960 citations

Peers

Ian M. Williams
Emily L. Spangler United States
Raphaël Giraud Switzerland
Juerg Schmidli Switzerland
Duraiyah Thangathurai United States
Taek Kyu Park South Korea
John C. Graham Australia
Jeong Jin Min South Korea
David P. Stonko United States
Emily L. Spangler United States
Ian M. Williams
Citations per year, relative to Ian M. Williams Ian M. Williams (= 1×) peers Emily L. Spangler

Countries citing papers authored by Ian M. Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ian M. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian M. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian M. Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ian M. Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian M. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian M. Williams. The network helps show where Ian M. Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ian M. Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ian M. Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ian M. Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ian M. Williams. Ian M. Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rosa, Michele De, et al.. (2025). Can Artificial Intelligence Revolutionise Surgical Decision-Making for Appendectomy? A Narrative Review. Surgical Innovation. 1111165027–1111165027.
2.
Stacey, Benjamin S., O James, Ian M. Williams, et al.. (2023). Personal protective equipment-induced systemic hypercapnic hypoxaemia: translational implications for impaired cognitive–clinical functional performance. British journal of surgery. 110(5). 606–613. 1 indexed citations
3.
Jubouri, Matti, et al.. (2023). Impact of patient demographics and intraoperative characteristics on abdominal aortic aneurysm sac following endovascular repair. Asian Cardiovascular and Thoracic Annals. 31(7). 633–643.
4.
Jubouri, Matti, et al.. (2022). Population risk profile analysis of acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Asian Cardiovascular and Thoracic Annals. 31(7). 549–556. 4 indexed citations
5.
Jubouri, Matti, et al.. (2022). Coronary artery involvement in type A aortic dissection: Fate of the coronaries. Journal of Cardiac Surgery. 37(12). 5233–5242. 7 indexed citations
6.
Tan, Sven Z. C. P., Matti Jubouri, Damian M. Bailey, et al.. (2022). Criteria for endovascular intervention in type B aortic dissection. Journal of Cardiac Surgery. 37(4). 987–992. 13 indexed citations
7.
Bashir, Mohamad, Matti Jubouri, Edward P. Chen, et al.. (2022). Cardiothoracic surgery leadership and learning are indispensable to each other. Journal of Cardiac Surgery. 37(12). 4204–4206. 1 indexed citations
8.
Bailey, Damian M., Richard G. Davies, G. Rose, et al.. (2022). Subjective assessment underestimates surgical risk: On the potential benefits of cardiopulmonary exercise testing for open thoracoabdominal repair. Journal of Cardiac Surgery. 37(8). 2258–2265. 5 indexed citations
9.
Bashir, Mohamad, Matti Jubouri, Sven Z. C. P. Tan, et al.. (2022). The misnomer of uncomplicated type B aortic dissection. Journal of Cardiac Surgery. 37(9). 2761–2765. 5 indexed citations
10.
Jubouri, Matti, et al.. (2022). Endovascular solutions for abdominal aortic aneurysms: A comparative review of clinical outcomes with custom-made endografts. Asian Cardiovascular and Thoracic Annals. 31(7). 565–576. 4 indexed citations
11.
Bashir, Mohamad, Matti Jubouri, Brenig Llwyd Gwilym, et al.. (2022). Ethnic & Sex Disparities in Type B Aortic Dissection Patients Undergoing Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair: An International Perspective. Annals of Vascular Surgery. 94. 68–79. 3 indexed citations
12.
Williams, Ian M., et al.. (2022). Malperfusion syndrome in acute type A aortic dissection: It's not what you know, it's what you can prove!. Journal of Cardiac Surgery. 37(11). 3835–3837. 1 indexed citations
13.
Jubouri, Matti, et al.. (2022). Correlative effect between sac regression and patient longevity following endovascular solution for abdominal aortic aneurysms: an international analysis. Asian Cardiovascular and Thoracic Annals. 31(7). 557–564. 2 indexed citations
15.
Bailey, Damian M., G. Rose, Daniel J. O’Donovan, et al.. (2022). Retroperitoneal Compared to Transperitoneal Approach for Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair Is Associated with Reduced Systemic Inflammation and Postoperative Morbidity. Aorta. 10(5). 225–234. 3 indexed citations
16.
Bashir, Mohamad, Damian M. Bailey, William David Jones, Richard White, & Ian M. Williams. (2021). The fate of the left subclavian artery in TEVAR for aortic arch pathology. Journal of Cardiac Surgery. 36(10). 3547–3553. 2 indexed citations
17.
Bailey, Damian M., M. H. Lewis, Andrew C. Gordon, et al.. (2021). When is extra-anatomical bypass for the left subclavian artery required to prevent ischaemia after thoracic endovascular stent grafting?. Asian Cardiovascular and Thoracic Annals. 29(6). 524–531. 1 indexed citations
18.
White, Richard, et al.. (2021). Renal Arteries Revisited: Anatomy, Pathologic Entities, and Implications for Endovascular Management. Radiographics. 41(3). 909–928. 7 indexed citations
19.
Jubouri, Matti, Mohamad Bashir, Sven Z. C. P. Tan, et al.. (2021). What is the optimal timing for thoracic endovascular aortic repair in uncomplicated Type B aortic dissection?. Journal of Cardiac Surgery. 37(4). 993–1001. 21 indexed citations
20.
White, Richard, et al.. (2020). Takayasu’s arteritis and acute type B aortic dissection treated with a stent graft. Vascular. 29(5). 657–660. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026