Richard Hogston
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Research and Theory top 1%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Roger WatsonIan J. DearyNoel RichardsonAlan WhiteP. MakaraSvend Aage MadsenRichard de VisserAnne Stimpson
- Topics
- Nursing education and management (3 papers)Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (2 papers)Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomDenmarkHungary
In The Last Decade
Richard Hogston
17 papers receiving 733 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- General Health Professions 471
- Clinical Psychology 218
- Research and Theory 157
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 146
- Social Psychology 128
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Hogston
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Hogston's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Hogston with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Hogston more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Hogston
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Hogston. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Hogston. The network helps show where Richard Hogston may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Hogston
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Hogston. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Hogston based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Hogston. Richard Hogston is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 30 | |
| 2 | 60 | |
| 3 | 40 | |
| 4 | Foundations of Nursing Practice: Themes, Concepts and Frameworks | 0 |
| 5 | 51 | |
| 6 | 118 | |
| 7 | Foundations of nursing practice : leading the way | 4 |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 345 | |
| 11 | Foundations of nursing practice : making the difference | 9 |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 31 | |
| 15 | 61 | |
| 16 | 40 | |
| 17 | 14 | |
| 18 | 3 |
About Richard Hogston
Richard Hogston is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Issues, ethics and legal aspects and Complementary and Manual Therapy, having authored 18 papers that have together received 820 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing education and management (3 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (2 papers) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (157 citations), Leadership and Management (46 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (40 citations). Richard Hogston has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Denmark and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Roger Watson, Ian J. Deary, Noel Richardson, Alan White, P. Makara, Svend Aage Madsen, Richard de Visser, Anne Stimpson, Helen Gibson and Eric Gardiner. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, Journal of Clinical Nursing and Nurse Education Today.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.