Richard Davies
- Molecular Biology
- Physiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Genetics
- Co-authors
- Tim D. SpectorJonathan WolfSarah BerryNicola SegataFrancesco AsnicarAna M. ValdesPaul W. FranksAndrew T. Chan
- Topics
- Nutritional Studies and Diet (5 papers)Gut microbiota and health (5 papers)Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease (4 papers)
- Journals
- NatureNature MedicineGut
- Partner nations
- United KingdomItalyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Richard Davies
17 papers receiving 491 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Molecular Biology 166
- Physiology 152
- Infectious Diseases 104
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 89
- Genetics 59
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Davies
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Davies's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Davies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Davies more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Davies
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Davies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Davies. The network helps show where Richard Davies may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Davies
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Davies. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Davies based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Davies. Richard Davies is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gut microbiome signatures of vegan, vegetarian and omnivore diets and associated health outcomes across 21,561 individualsbreakdown → | 36 |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | Effects of a personalized nutrition program on cardiometabolic health: a randomized controlled trialbreakdown → | 49 |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | 31 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 90 | |
| 8 | 119 | |
| 9 | 34 | |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 68 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 15 | |
| 18 | 8 |
About Richard Davies
Richard Davies is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Modeling and Simulation, having authored 18 papers that have together received 499 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nutritional Studies and Diet (5 papers), Gut microbiota and health (5 papers) and Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (152 citations), Gastroenterology (32 citations) and Infectious Diseases (104 citations). Richard Davies has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and United States. Frequent co-authors include Tim D. Spector, Jonathan Wolf, Sarah Berry, Nicola Segata, Francesco Asnicar, Ana M. Valdes, Paul W. Franks, Andrew T. Chan, Claire J. Steves and George Hadjigeorgiou. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Nature Medicine and Gut.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.