Richard Cross
- Philosophy top 1%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Religious studies top 2%
- History top 5%
- Co-authors
- Michael A. WestonPatrick‐Jean GuayEmily M. McLeodRandall W. RobinsonRaoul A. MulderDavid HaymanMark GardinerSheila Hamilton‐Dyer
- Topics
- Medieval Philosophy and Theology (44 papers)Theology and Philosophy of Evil (22 papers)Karl Barth and Christian Theology (15 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomPhilippines
In The Last Decade
Richard Cross
64 papers receiving 300 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Philosophy 257
- History and Philosophy of Science 88
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 50
- Religious studies 47
- History 45
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Cross
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Cross's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Cross with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Cross more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Cross
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Cross. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Cross. The network helps show where Richard Cross may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Cross
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Cross. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Cross based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Cross. Richard Cross is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 37 | |
| 7 | The opera theologica of John Duns Scotus : proceedings of "the Quadruple Congress" on John Duns Scotus, part 2 | 0 |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | The Platonic Tradition in the Middle Ages: A Doxographic Approach | 0 |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | Medieval theories of haecceity | 10 |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | "Where angels fear to tread": Duns Scotus and radical orthodoxy | 11 |
| 17 | Identity, Origin, and Persistence in Duns Scotus's Physics | 2 |
| 18 | The Physics of Duns Scotus: The Scientific Context of a Theological Vision | 15 |
| 19 | 39 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Richard Cross
Richard Cross is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science and Classics, having authored 81 papers that have together received 412 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Philosophy and Theology (44 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (22 papers) and Karl Barth and Christian Theology (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (257 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (88 citations) and Classics (41 citations). Richard Cross has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Philippines. Frequent co-authors include Michael A. Weston, Patrick‐Jean Guay, Emily M. McLeod, Randall W. Robinson, Raoul A. Mulder, David Hayman, Mark Gardiner, Sheila Hamilton‐Dyer, Mostafa Hassanalian and Marilyn McCord Adams. Their work appears in journals such as Wildlife Research, Philosophy Compass and Studies in Romanticism.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.