Emily M. McLeod

962 total citations
25 papers, 700 citations indexed

About

Emily M. McLeod is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Genetics and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily M. McLeod has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 700 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Social Psychology, 9 papers in Genetics and 8 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in Emily M. McLeod's work include Animal and Plant Science Education (9 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (8 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (6 papers). Emily M. McLeod is often cited by papers focused on Animal and Plant Science Education (9 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (8 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (6 papers). Emily M. McLeod collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. Emily M. McLeod's co-authors include Michael A. Weston, Patrick‐Jean Guay, Daniel T. Blumstein, Randall W. Robinson, Tiffani J. Howell, Julien D. Périard, David B. Pyne, Kristy Martin, Ben Rattray and Richard Keegan and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, The Science of The Total Environment and Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

In The Last Decade

Emily M. McLeod

24 papers receiving 679 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emily M. McLeod Australia 13 352 196 163 131 71 25 700
Tanja M. Straka Germany 16 233 0.7× 202 1.0× 110 0.7× 64 0.5× 122 1.7× 41 574
Courtney L. Larson United States 9 324 0.9× 61 0.3× 140 0.9× 70 0.5× 50 0.7× 21 613
Hannah S. Mumby United Kingdom 13 392 1.1× 123 0.6× 157 1.0× 178 1.4× 13 0.2× 31 806
Eric G. Strauss United States 13 197 0.6× 82 0.4× 57 0.3× 158 1.2× 87 1.2× 32 568
Matthias‐Claudio Loretto Austria 16 323 0.9× 451 2.3× 327 2.0× 105 0.8× 59 0.8× 31 1.1k
Mathieu Douhard France 16 598 1.7× 339 1.7× 110 0.7× 257 2.0× 24 0.3× 33 1.0k
Carlos Drews Costa Rica 9 391 1.1× 390 2.0× 360 2.2× 127 1.0× 62 0.9× 13 981
Vasilios Liordos Greece 15 372 1.1× 91 0.5× 213 1.3× 97 0.7× 115 1.6× 50 628
Shawan Chowdhury Australia 16 154 0.4× 211 1.1× 115 0.7× 106 0.8× 52 0.7× 30 684
Vasileios J. Kontsiotis Greece 12 286 0.8× 56 0.3× 213 1.3× 91 0.7× 67 0.9× 38 487

Countries citing papers authored by Emily M. McLeod

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily M. McLeod's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily M. McLeod with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily M. McLeod more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily M. McLeod

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily M. McLeod. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily M. McLeod. The network helps show where Emily M. McLeod may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily M. McLeod

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily M. McLeod. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily M. McLeod based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily M. McLeod. Emily M. McLeod is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
McLeod, Emily M., et al.. (2023). Bird feeding at urban wetlands: A comparison of demographics, attitudes and norms between feeders and non-feeders. The Science of The Total Environment. 891. 164060–164060.
2.
Pearson, Elissa, et al.. (2022). Can we save Australia’s endangered wildlife by increasing species recognition?. Journal for Nature Conservation. 69. 126257–126257. 7 indexed citations
3.
Ryan, Jillian, et al.. (2021). Challenges and successes to the implementation of a zoo conservation-education program. Evaluation and Program Planning. 88. 101950–101950. 4 indexed citations
4.
McLeod, Emily M., et al.. (2021). Human Positioning in Close-Encounter Photographs and the Effect on Public Perceptions of Zoo Animals. Animals. 12(1). 11–11. 12 indexed citations
5.
Eeden, Lily M. van, et al.. (2021). Putting the cat before the wildlife: Exploring cat owners' beliefs about cat containment as predictors of owner behavior. Conservation Science and Practice. 3(10). 31 indexed citations
7.
Selinske, Matthew J., Georgia E. Garrard, Emily A. Gregg, et al.. (2020). Identifying and prioritizing human behaviors that benefit biodiversity. Conservation Science and Practice. 2(9). 40 indexed citations
8.
Pearson, Elissa, et al.. (2019). What goes up must come down: an evaluation of a zoo conservation-education program for balloon litter on visitor understanding, attitudes, and behaviour. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 27(9). 1393–1415. 20 indexed citations
9.
Howell, Tiffani J., Emily M. McLeod, & Grahame J. Coleman. (2019). When zoo visitors “connect” with a zoo animal, what does that mean?. Zoo Biology. 38(6). 461–470. 30 indexed citations
10.
Martin, Kristy, Emily M. McLeod, Julien D. Périard, et al.. (2019). The Impact of Environmental Stress on Cognitive Performance: A Systematic Review. Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 61(8). 1205–1246. 87 indexed citations
11.
Guay, Patrick‐Jean, Wouter F. D. van Dongen, Emily M. McLeod, et al.. (2018). Does zonation and accessibility of wetlands influence human presence and mediate wildlife disturbance?. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 62(8). 1306–1320. 10 indexed citations
12.
Kekelis, Linda, Jean J. Ryoo, & Emily M. McLeod. (2017). Making and Mentors: What It Takes to Make Them Better Together.. 3 indexed citations
13.
Weston, Michael A., Patrick‐Jean Guay, Emily M. McLeod, & Kelly K. Miller. (2015). Do Birdwatchers Care about Bird Disturbance?. Anthrozoös. 28(2). 305–317. 15 indexed citations
14.
Dongen, Wouter F. D. van, Emily M. McLeod, Raoul A. Mulder, Michael A. Weston, & Patrick‐Jean Guay. (2015). The height of approaching humans does not affect flight-initiation distance. Bird Study. 62(2). 285–288. 13 indexed citations
15.
Weston, Michael A., Patrick‐Jean Guay, Emily M. McLeod, & Kelly K. Miller. (2015). Do Birdwatchers Care about Bird Disturbance?. Anthrozoös. 28(2). 305–317. 4 indexed citations
16.
Guay, Patrick‐Jean, et al.. (2014). Are vehicles 'mobile bird hides'?: A test of the hypothesis that 'cars cause less disturbance'. The Victorian naturalist. 131(4). 150–153. 10 indexed citations
17.
Guay, Patrick‐Jean, Emily M. McLeod, Richard Cross, et al.. (2013). Observer effects occur when estimating alert but not flight-initiation distances. Wildlife Research. 40(4). 289–293. 37 indexed citations
18.
McLeod, Emily M., et al.. (2013). Buses, Cars, Bicycles and Walkers: The Influence of the Type of Human Transport on the Flight Responses of Waterbirds. PLoS ONE. 8(12). e82008–e82008. 84 indexed citations
19.
Weston, Michael A., Emily M. McLeod, Daniel T. Blumstein, & Patrick‐Jean Guay. (2012). A review of flight-initiation distances and their application to managing disturbance to Australian birds. Emu - Austral Ornithology. 112(4). 269–286. 213 indexed citations
20.
McLeod, Emily M., et al.. (2003). Uncovering Meaning: How Nursing Knowledge Changes Policy in Practice. Nursing Science Quarterly. 16(2). 115–119. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026