Richard Borie

39 total papers · 597 total citations
21 papers, 309 citations indexed

About

Richard Borie is a scholar working on Computer Networks and Communications, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Richard Borie has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 309 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Computer Networks and Communications, 8 papers in Computational Theory and Mathematics and 6 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Richard Borie's work include Advanced Graph Theory Research (7 papers), Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs (4 papers) and Software Engineering Research (4 papers). Richard Borie is often cited by papers focused on Advanced Graph Theory Research (7 papers), Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs (4 papers) and Software Engineering Research (4 papers). Richard Borie collaborates with scholars based in United States and Australia. Richard Borie's co-authors include Craig A. Tovey, Robert Parker, Allen Parrish, Sven Koenig, Xiaoyan Hong, Xiaoming Zheng, Bo Gu, Pu Wang, Philip Kilby and Pınar Keskinocak and has published in prestigious journals such as ACM Computing Surveys, Annals of Operations Research and Journal of Systems and Software.

In The Last Decade

Richard Borie

20 papers receiving 279 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Richard Borie	167	122	46	40	38	21	309
Stefan Näher	101 0.6×	87 0.7×	12 0.3×	110 2.8×	66 1.7×	23	334
Ljubomir Perković	83 0.5×	41 0.3×	16 0.3×	32 0.8×	11 0.3×	23	254
Vadim Engelson	119 0.7×	48 0.4×	18 0.4×	38 0.9×	24 0.6×	26	221
James F. Gimpel	106 0.6×	60 0.5×	29 0.6×	109 2.7×	16 0.4×	16	274
Koichi Yamazaki	118 0.7×	153 1.3×	6 0.1×	42 1.1×	14 0.4×	37	331
Loukas Georgiadis	128 0.8×	132 1.1×	20 0.4×	65 1.6×	19 0.5×	32	237
Norbert Blüm	182 1.1×	98 0.8×	9 0.2×	145 3.6×	11 0.3×	22	300
H. Ramesh	137 0.8×	61 0.5×	8 0.2×	122 3.0×	17 0.4×	14	294
Ran Duan	151 0.9×	139 1.1×	4 0.1×	66 1.6×	28 0.7×	18	271
William A. Martin	79 0.5×	63 0.5×	19 0.4×	165 4.1×	31 0.8×	18	284

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Borie

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Borie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Borie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Borie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Borie

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Borie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Borie. The network helps show where Richard Borie may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Borie

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Borie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Borie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Borie. Richard Borie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact