Robert Parker

1.9k citations
79 papers · 1.2k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Robert Parker

75 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Robert Parker
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 221
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 226
  • Pollution 141
  • Plant Science 393
  • Computer Networks and Communications 164
Replace J. A. John with:
J. A. John United Kingdom
Md. Abul Kalam Azad Bangladesh
Robert P. Davis United States
Wilfred Candler United States
Yangming Zhou China
Peter Chapman United Kingdom
Lingling Wang China
Daming Li China
Xavier Rubio‐Campillo Spain
Robert Parker relative to J. A. John United Kingdom J. A. John's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.4×
J. A. John · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Parker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Parker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Parker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Parker. The network helps show where Robert Parker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Parker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Parker Line = papers co-authored together Robert Parker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 79 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992130
2
Weeds of the West.
1991126
3 201860
4 201747
5 198442
6 199340
7 198739
8 197737
9
Deterministic Scheduling Theory
199535
10 201235
11 199532
12 199231
13 197631
14 199228
15 199224
16 198324
17 198624
18 200621
19 199321
20 200119

About Robert Parker

Robert Parker is a scholar working on Plant Science, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Computer Networks and Communications and Pollution, having authored 79 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Graph Theory Research (16 papers), Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (12 papers), Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies (10 papers), Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms (10 papers), Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods (7 papers), Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs (7 papers), Optimization and Packing Problems (6 papers) and Optimization and Search Problems (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (221 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (226 citations), Pollution (141 citations), Plant Science (393 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (164 citations). Robert Parker has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Kassim Al‐Khatib, Richard Borie, Craig A. Tovey, E. Patrick Fuerst, Ronald L. Rardin, Richard A. Holmes, Rebecca Lewis, T.D. Whitson, Steven A. Dewey and David W. Cudney. Their work appears in journals such as Weed Technology, Discrete Applied Mathematics, European Journal of Operational Research, Journal of the Operational Research Society and Weed Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact