Richard Blute

966 citations
25 papers · 374 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Richard Blute

23 papers receiving 329 citations

Peers

Richard Blute
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 220
  • Mathematical Physics 106
  • Artificial Intelligence 290
  • Algebra and Number Theory 39
  • Geometry and Topology 64
Replace Martin Hyland with:
Martin Hyland United Kingdom
Dominic Verity Australia
Miguel L. Laplaza Puerto Rico
Peter Hertling Germany
Keye Martin United States
Kimmo I. Rosenthal United States
Laurent Régnier France
Wilfried Buchholz Germany
Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine United States
G. Hansel France
Richard Blute relative to Martin Hyland United Kingdom Martin Hyland's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Martin Hyland · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Blute

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Blute's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Blute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Blute more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Blute

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Blute. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Blute. The network helps show where Richard Blute may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Richard Blute, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard Blute Line = papers co-authored together Richard Blute links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199659
2 200640
3 199336
4 199932
5 199628
6 200924
7 200221
8 199717
9 199615
10 200315
11 200013
12 199811
13 201911
14 199610
15 20048
16 19978
17 20026
18 20026
19 20105
20 20143

About Richard Blute

Richard Blute is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Mathematical Physics, Geometry and Topology and Algebra and Number Theory, having authored 25 papers that have together received 374 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, programming, and type systems (14 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (10 papers), Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (10 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (9 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (7 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (5 papers), Formal Methods in Verification (3 papers) and Petri Nets in System Modeling (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (220 citations), Mathematical Physics (106 citations), Artificial Intelligence (290 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (39 citations) and Geometry and Topology (64 citations). Richard Blute has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include R. A. G. Seely, J.R.B. Cockett, Prakash Panangaden, Philip Scott, Samson Abramsky, Josée Desharnais, Abbas Edalat, Paul Ruet, F. Lamarche and Dorette Pronk. Their work appears in journals such as Mathematical Structures in Computer Science, Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra, Applied Categorical Structures, Theory and applications of categories and Annals of Pure and Applied Logic.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact