Countries citing papers authored by R. A. G. Seely
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of R. A. G. Seely's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. A. G. Seely with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. A. G. Seely more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. A. G. Seely. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. A. G. Seely. The network helps show where R. A. G. Seely may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. A. G. Seely
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. A. G. Seely.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. A. G. Seely based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with R. A. G. Seely. R. A. G. Seely is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Cockett, J.R.B. & R. A. G. Seely. (2018). Proof Theory of the Cut Rule. Oxford University Press eBooks.2 indexed citations
Cockett, J.R.B. & R. A. G. Seely. (2011). The Faà di Bruno construction. Theory and applications of categories. 25. 393–425.1 indexed citations
4.
Hart, Bradd, et al.. (2011). Models, Logics, and Higher-dimensional Categories: A Tribute to the Work of Mihaly Makkai. Medical Entomology and Zoology.3 indexed citations
5.
Cockett, J.R.B. & R. A. G. Seely. (2011). THE FA ` A DI BRUNO CONSTRUCTION.1 indexed citations
6.
Blute, Richard, J.R.B. Cockett, & R. A. G. Seely. (2009). Cartesian Differential Categories. Theory and applications of categories. 22. 622–672.24 indexed citations
7.
Blute, Richard, J.R.B. Cockett, & R. A. G. Seely. (2006). Differential categories. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science. 16(6). 1049–1083.40 indexed citations
8.
Cockett, J.R.B., et al.. (2003). Modules. Theory and applications of categories. 11. 375–396.
Cockett, J.R.B., et al.. (2000). Introduction to linear bicategories. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science. 10(2). 165–203.25 indexed citations
11.
Cockett, J.R.B. & R. A. G. Seely. (1999). Linearly distributive functors. Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra. 143(1-3). 155–203.22 indexed citations
12.
Cockett, J.R.B. & R. A. G. Seely. (1997). Weakly distributive categories. Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra. 114(2). 133–173.80 indexed citations
13.
Cockett, J.R.B. & R. A. G. Seely. (1997). Proof theory for full intuitionistic linear logic, bilinear logic, and MIX categories.. 3. 85–131.41 indexed citations
Blute, Richard, J.R.B. Cockett, & R. A. G. Seely. (1996). ! and ? – Storage as tensorial strength. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science. 6(4). 313–351.10 indexed citations
16.
Panangaden, Prakash, et al.. (1995). A logical view of concurrent constraint programming. Nordic journal of computing. 2(2). 181–220.12 indexed citations
17.
Blute, Richard, Prakash Panangaden, & R. A. G. Seely. (1994). Holomorphic models of exponential types in linear logic. Lecture notes in computer science. 474–512.1 indexed citations
18.
Crossley, John N., et al.. (1994). A logical calculus for polynomial-time realizability. 1(3). 279–298.2 indexed citations
19.
Seely, R. A. G.. (1987). Modelling Computations: A 2-Categorical Framework. Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government). 65–71.21 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.