Philip Scott

6.6k total citations · 1 hit paper
138 papers, 2.6k citations indexed

About

Philip Scott is a scholar working on Health Information Management, Artificial Intelligence and Computational Theory and Mathematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip Scott has authored 138 papers receiving a total of 2.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 44 papers in Health Information Management, 32 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 24 papers in Computational Theory and Mathematics. Recurrent topics in Philip Scott's work include Electronic Health Records Systems (38 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (27 papers) and Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (22 papers). Philip Scott is often cited by papers focused on Electronic Health Records Systems (38 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (27 papers) and Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (22 papers). Philip Scott collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Philip Scott's co-authors include J. Lambek, J. L. Bell, Andre Scedrov, Niels Peek, Paul Fremantle, Mark Sujan, Jean-Yves Girard, Andrew Georgiou, Esfandiar Haghverdi and Gary S. Nabors and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, The Journal of Immunology and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Philip Scott

127 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Hit Papers

Introduction to Higher Order Categorical Logic. 1989 2026 2001 2013 1989 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Philip Scott United Kingdom 23 1.1k 704 302 292 260 138 2.6k
Graciela Gonzalez‐Hernandez United States 32 2.1k 1.8× 595 0.8× 235 0.8× 320 1.1× 118 0.5× 158 4.4k
Michael R. Kosorok United States 45 733 0.6× 85 0.1× 294 1.0× 351 1.2× 56 0.2× 240 8.4k
Michael J. Ward United States 30 114 0.1× 55 0.1× 219 0.7× 279 1.0× 131 0.5× 156 2.8k
José Luís Oliveira Portugal 29 966 0.8× 246 0.3× 86 0.3× 147 0.5× 144 0.6× 263 3.2k
Chi‐Ren Shyu United States 28 622 0.5× 74 0.1× 123 0.4× 117 0.4× 74 0.3× 191 3.1k
Marianthi Markatou United States 31 702 0.6× 170 0.2× 96 0.3× 135 0.5× 201 0.8× 87 2.7k
Olivier Bodenreider United States 34 4.4k 3.9× 533 0.8× 124 0.4× 210 0.7× 693 2.7× 216 7.0k
Karin Verspoor Australia 34 2.1k 1.8× 171 0.2× 159 0.5× 172 0.6× 162 0.6× 246 3.8k
Trevor Cohen United States 27 904 0.8× 191 0.3× 322 1.1× 236 0.8× 237 0.9× 141 2.6k
Abeed Sarker United States 27 1.4k 1.2× 336 0.5× 172 0.6× 335 1.1× 101 0.4× 123 3.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Scott. The network helps show where Philip Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Scott

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Scott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Scott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Scott. Philip Scott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Scott, Philip, et al.. (2023). One Health in a Digital World: Technology, Data, Information and Knowledge. Yearbook of Medical Informatics. 32(1). 10–18. 5 indexed citations
2.
Peek, Niels, Mark Sujan, & Philip Scott. (2023). Digital health and care: emerging from pandemic times. BMJ Health & Care Informatics. 30(1). e100861–e100861. 6 indexed citations
3.
Cresswell, Kathrin, Michael Rigby, Farah Magrabi, et al.. (2023). The need to strengthen the evaluation of the impact of Artificial Intelligence-based decision support systems on healthcare provision. Health Policy. 136. 104889–104889. 14 indexed citations
5.
Lovis, Christian, et al.. (2020). Digital Personalized Health and Medicine: Proceedings of MIE 2020. 3 indexed citations
6.
Sujan, Mark, Philip Scott, & Kathrin Cresswell. (2019). Digital health and patient safety: Technology is not a magic wand. Health Informatics Journal. 26(4). 2295–2299. 15 indexed citations
7.
Good, Alice, et al.. (2018). The role of ICT education and trainings in poverty reduction and economic empowerment: a case study of Jigawa state government ICT4D intervention. 16(1). 1–17. 6 indexed citations
8.
Scott, Philip, Ronald Cornet, Colin McCowan, et al.. (2017). Informatics for Health 2017: Advancing both science and practice. Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics. 24(1). 1–1. 7 indexed citations
9.
Scott, Philip. (2016). Abdominal ultrasonography as an adjunct to clinical examination in sheep. Small Ruminant Research. 152. 132–143. 6 indexed citations
10.
Scott, Philip, Iain Carpenter, David I. Harvey, et al.. (2015). Developing a conformance methodology for clinically-defined medical record headings: A preliminary report. Portsmouth Research Portal (University of Portsmouth). 11(2). 3 indexed citations
11.
Scott, Philip, et al.. (2015). Health Information Technology In Developing Countries: A Structured Literature Review With Reference To The Case Of Libya. Portsmouth Research Portal (University of Portsmouth). 3 indexed citations
12.
Scott, Philip. (2013). Diagnosis and treatment of respiratory disease in adult sheep based upon ultrasonographic examination of the chest. Large animals review. 19(1). 33–37. 1 indexed citations
13.
Scott, Philip & Neil Sargison. (2012). Ultrasonographic findings in adult cattle with chronic respiratory disease. Large animals review. 18(1). 27–30. 1 indexed citations
14.
Bruce, James I., et al.. (2011). Investigating employee resistance to Lean transformation: UK case study.. Nursing Research. 17(1). 52–5. 3 indexed citations
15.
Scott, Philip, et al.. (2009). SIG e sensoriamento remoto para a determinação do potencial da aqüicultura no baixo São João - RJ. LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas). 3 indexed citations
16.
Scott, Philip, et al.. (2006). A categorical semantics for polarizedMALL. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic. 145(3). 276–313. 6 indexed citations
17.
Andrew, Elizabeth M., Darren Newton, Jane E. Dalton, et al.. (2005). Delineation of the Function of a Major γδ T Cell Subset during Infection. The Journal of Immunology. 175(3). 1741–1750. 41 indexed citations
18.
Panangaden, Prakash, et al.. (1995). A logical view of concurrent constraint programming. Nordic journal of computing. 2(2). 181–220. 12 indexed citations
19.
Bellin, Gianluigi & Philip Scott. (1994). On the π-calculus and linear logic. Theoretical Computer Science. 135(1). 11–65. 65 indexed citations
20.
Scott, Philip. (1982). Review: Robert Goldblatt, Topoi. The Categorical Analysis of Logic. Journal of Symbolic Logic. 47(2). 1077–1078. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026