Richard Bell

6.3k citations
87 papers · 4.6k indexed · 2 hit papers · h-index 25

Richard Bell

82 papers receiving 4.2k citations

Hit Papers

Psychometric properties of the Impact of...1.5k197720261993200950010001.5k

Peers

Richard Bell
Comparison fields: 5 of 180
  • Clinical Psychology 2.3k
  • Social Psychology 1.2k
  • Applied Psychology 216
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 597
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 474
Replace Clw Chan with:
Clw Chan Hong Kong
Stephen N. Haynes United States
Richard A. Kulka United States
Espen Røysamb Norway
Darcy A. Santor Canada
Ellie Fossey Australia
Juana Gómez‐Benito Spain
Edward S. Kubany United States
Étienne Mullet France
Tuan D. Nguyen United States
Richard Bell relative to Clw Chan Hong Kong Clw Chan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Clw Chan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Bell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Bell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Bell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Bell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Bell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Bell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Bell. The network helps show where Richard Bell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Richard Bell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard Bell Line = papers co-authored together Richard Bell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20211
2
Changing Culture and Challenging Stereotypes: Lets Build Bridges and Diversify!
20191
3 20189
4 201827
5 201736
6 201516
7
Insurgence at the museum of democracy: An interview
20140
8 201048
9
A history of women in sport prior to Title IX
200712
10 200614
11
Communicating During Emergencies in the United States
20044
12
Psychometric properties of the Impact of Event Scale—Revisedbreakdown →
20031505
13 200323
14 200180
15 199411
16 199236
17 199229
18 199184
19 199044
20 19792

About Richard Bell

Richard Bell is a scholar working on Computational Mathematics, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 87 papers that have together received 4.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cognitive and psychological constructs research (20 papers), Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (11 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (7 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (6 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (4 papers) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (2.3k citations), Social Psychology (1.2k citations) and Applied Psychology (216 citations). Richard Bell has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mark Creamer, D. Bannister, Fay Fransella, Henry J. Jackson, James M. Foran, Patrick D. McGorry, Jennifer Boldero, Paul Dudgeon, Gene Hodgins and Glen Bates. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Constructivist Psychology, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, Applied Psychological Measurement, International Gambling Studies and Behaviour Research and Therapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026