Journal of Constructivist Psychology

712 papers and 6.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 712 papers published in Journal of Constructivist Psychology in the last decades have received a total of 6.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Constructivist Psychology usually cover Social Psychology (434 papers), Clinical Psychology (363 papers) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (107 papers) specifically the topics of Cognitive and psychological constructs research (191 papers), Social Representations and Identity (184 papers) and Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (182 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Constructivist Psychology are Hubert J. M. Hermans, Robert A. Neimeyer, Dan P. McAdams, James Gillies, Meg Barker, Giancarlo Dimaggio, Svend Brinkmann, Steinar Kvale, John Shotter and Miguel M. Gonçalves.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Constructivist Psychology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Constructivist Psychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Constructivist Psychology.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Constructivist Psychology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Constructivist Psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Constructivist Psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Constructivist Psychology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025