Richard Baum

937 citations
41 papers · 400 indexed · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Richard Baum

36 papers receiving 274 citations

Peers

Richard Baum
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Political Science and International Relations 211
  • Sociology and Political Science 244
  • Development 18
  • Public Administration 11
  • Cultural Studies 17
Replace Robert E. Bedeski with:
Robert E. Bedeski Canada
George W. Breslauer United States
Stanley B. Greenberg United States
Beverly Crawford United States
Giuseppe Di Palma United States
Nico Randeraad Netherlands
Piero Gleijeses United States
Parris H. Chang United States
Luigi Graziano Italy
J. Samuel Valenzuela United States
Richard Baum relative to Robert E. Bedeski Canada Robert E. Bedeski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Robert E. Bedeski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Baum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Baum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Baum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Baum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Baum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Baum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Baum. The network helps show where Richard Baum may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Richard Baum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard Baum Line = papers co-authored together Richard Baum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199474
2
Ssu-ch'ing: the socialist education movement of 1962-1966
196842
3 200436
4 197623
5 197821
6 198619
7 198015
8 198712
9 198211
10 199211
11 196410
12 200010
13 199610
14 201410
15 19989
16 20017
17 19697
18 20196
19 19686
20 19686

About Richard Baum

Richard Baum is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Business and International Management, Sociology and Political Science, History and Philosophy of Science and Anthropology, having authored 41 papers that have together received 400 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (13 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (8 papers), Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics (4 papers), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (2 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (2 papers), Infectious Aortic and Vascular Conditions (1 paper), Historical Economic and Social Studies (1 paper) and Vascular Procedures and Complications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (211 citations), Sociology and Political Science (244 citations), Development (18 citations), Public Administration (11 citations) and Cultural Studies (17 citations). Richard Baum has collaborated with scholars based in United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Zhang Xin, Frederick C. Teiwes, Donald S. Zagoria, Nina P. Halpern, Mark L. Baum, Morton A. Bosniak, Rong Ma, Frank J. Veith, Manoranjan Mohanty and Steven A. Hecht. Their work appears in journals such as Asian Survey, The China Quarterly, Pacific Affairs, The China Journal and The Journal of Asian Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026