Mark L. Baum
Impact in
- Nephrology top 10%
- Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
-
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions 1
-
- Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments 1
- Co-authors
- Harry Smith (1 shared paper)Henry S. Sacks (1 shared paper)Richard M. Fagerstrom (1 shared paper)Thomas C. Chalmers (1 shared paper)Robert F. Slifkin (1 shared paper)Martin S. Neff (1 shared paper)Arnold R. Eiser (1 shared paper)Richard Baum (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- New England Journal of Medicine (1 paper)The American Journal of Medicine (1 paper)Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography (1 paper)RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren (1 paper)Allergologia et Immunopathologia (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Mark L. Baum
8 papers receiving 317 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Nephrology 46
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 36
- Surgery 208
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 97
- Oncology 102
Countries citing papers authored by Mark L. Baum
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark L. Baum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark L. Baum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark L. Baum more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark L. Baum
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark L. Baum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark L. Baum. The network helps show where Mark L. Baum may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 18 scholars most cited alongside Mark L. Baum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1981 | 256 | |
| 2 | 1983 | 61 | |
| 3 | Stress fractures and reduced bone mineral density with prior anorexia nervosa. | 1987 | 12 |
| 4 | 1987 | 12 | |
| 5 | 'Early' breast cancer, bone scanning, and the urinary excretion of hydroxyproline. | 1973 | 11 |
| 6 | 2012 | 6 | |
| 7 | 1984 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2000 | 4 |
About Mark L. Baum
Mark L. Baum is a scholar working on Toxicology, Nephrology, Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Surgery, having authored 8 papers that have together received 366 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions (1 paper), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (1 paper), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (1 paper), Vascular Procedures and Complications (1 paper), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (1 paper), Esophageal and GI Pathology (1 paper), Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (1 paper) and Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (46 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (36 citations), Surgery (208 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (97 citations) and Oncology (102 citations). Mark L. Baum has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Harry Smith, Henry S. Sacks, Richard M. Fagerstrom, Thomas C. Chalmers, Robert F. Slifkin, Martin S. Neff, Arnold R. Eiser, Richard Baum, Joseph J. Sanger and Elissa L. Kramer. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, The American Journal of Medicine, Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren and Allergologia et Immunopathologia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.