Countries citing papers authored by Richard A. Young
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard A. Young's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard A. Young with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard A. Young more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard A. Young
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard A. Young. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard A. Young. The network helps show where Richard A. Young may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard A. Young
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard A. Young.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard A. Young based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Richard A. Young. Richard A. Young is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Collin, Audrey, Audrey Collin, Richard A. Young, et al.. (2000). The Future of Career. Cambridge University Press eBooks.59 indexed citations
10.
Young, Richard A.. (2000). The Knowledge of God in Romans 1:18-23: Exegetical and Theological Reflections. Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society. 43(4). 695.2 indexed citations
11.
Young, Richard A.. (1998). Beyond Liberalism and Fundamentalism: How Modern and Postmodern Philosophy Set the Theological Agenda. Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society. 41(4). 663.5 indexed citations
12.
Young, Richard A. & Ladislav Valach. (1994). Evaluation of Career Development Programs from an Action Perspective.. Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy. 28(4). 299–307.3 indexed citations
13.
Young, Richard A., et al.. (1991). Personal Constructions of Parental Influence Relatied to Career Development. Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy. 25(2).9 indexed citations
14.
Collin, Audrey & Richard A. Young. (1988). Career Development and Hermeneutical Inquiry Part II: Undertaking Hermeneutical Research.. Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy. 22(4). 191–201.18 indexed citations
15.
Young, Richard A.. (1986). Doning Human Science Research: A Reply to Van Hesteren. Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy. 20(4).1 indexed citations
16.
Lang, Péter & Richard A. Young. (1985). Pastoral Care in English Schools: A Canadian Perspective. Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy. 19.2 indexed citations
17.
Young, Richard A.. (1984). Toward an Ecology of Career Development. Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy. 18(4).10 indexed citations
18.
Young, Richard A., et al.. (1982). Specifying air pollution control equipment. M. Dekker eBooks.1 indexed citations
19.
Young, Richard A. & William A. Borgen. (1979). Developmental consultation in implementing career education programs. Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy. 13(4).3 indexed citations
20.
Young, Richard A.. (1974). The farsa del mundo y moral of Fernán López de Yanguas and the auto sacramental. 10(19). 9–17.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.