John D. Nason
Impact in
-
- Plant and animal studies
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 0.5%
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Papers in
-
- Plant and animal studies 62
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 28
- Co-authors
- Victoria L. SorkBette A. LoiselleCatherine H. GrahamJ. L. HamrickStephen B. HeardRodney J. DyerNorman C. EllstrandEdward Allen Herre
- Journals
- Evolution (14 papers)American Journal of Botany (13 papers)Molecular Ecology (10 papers)Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (3 papers)Ecological Monographs (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth KoreaChina
In The Last Decade
John D. Nason
83 papers receiving 6.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 3.5k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.9k
- Genetics 3.3k
- Ecological Modeling 321
- Plant Science 2.5k
Countries citing papers authored by John D. Nason
This map shows the geographic impact of John D. Nason's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John D. Nason with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John D. Nason more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John D. Nason
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John D. Nason. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John D. Nason. The network helps show where John D. Nason may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John D. Nason, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 25 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 44 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 149 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 55 | |
| 13 | 2007 | 51 | |
| 14 | 2007 | 27 | |
| 15 | 2006 | 49 | |
| 16 | 2004 | 53 | |
| 17 | 2004 | 239 | |
| 18 | 2004 | 92 | |
| 19 | 2001 | 179 | |
| 20 | Spatial genetic structure of a tropical understory shrub, PSYCHOTRIA OFFICINALIS (RuBIACEAE) Hit paper breakdown → | 1995 | 1184 |
About John D. Nason
John D. Nason is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Genetics, Plant Science and Endocrinology, having authored 84 papers that have together received 6.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (62 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (40 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (28 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (16 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (8 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (7 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (6 papers) and Botanical Research and Applications (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (3.5k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.9k citations), Genetics (3.3k citations), Ecological Modeling (321 citations) and Plant Science (2.5k citations). John D. Nason has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and China. Frequent co-authors include Victoria L. Sork, Bette A. Loiselle, Catherine H. Graham, J. L. Hamrick, Stephen B. Heard, Rodney J. Dyer, Norman C. Ellstrand, Edward Allen Herre, John O. Stireman and J. L. Hamrick. Their work appears in journals such as Evolution, American Journal of Botany, Molecular Ecology, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and Ecological Monographs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.