Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance☆
20093.9k citationsRenée B. Adams, Daniel FerreiraJournal of Financial Economicsprofile →
A Theory of Friendly Boards
20071.7k citationsRenée B. Adams, Daniel Ferreiraprofile →
The Role of Boards of Directors in Corporate Governance: A Conceptual Framework and Survey
20101.6k citationsRenée B. Adams, Benjamin E. Hermalin et al.Journal of Economic Literatureprofile →
Powerful CEOs and Their Impact on Corporate Performance
20051.2k citationsRenée B. Adams, Heitor Almeida et al.Review of Financial Studiesprofile →
Countries citing papers authored by Renée B. Adams
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Renée B. Adams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Renée B. Adams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Renée B. Adams more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Renée B. Adams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Renée B. Adams. The network helps show where Renée B. Adams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Renée B. Adams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Renée B. Adams.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Renée B. Adams based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Renée B. Adams. Renée B. Adams is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Adams, Renée B., Vanitha Ragunathan, & Robert Tumarkin. (2015). Death by Committee? An Analysis of Delegation in Corporate Boards. SSRN Electronic Journal.9 indexed citations
9.
Adams, Renée B.. (2015). Myths and facts about female directors. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1–16.9 indexed citations
10.
Adams, Renée B., Ali C. Akyol, & Patrick Verwijmeren. (2013). Director Skill Sets. SSRN Electronic Journal.13 indexed citations
Adams, Renée B., Benjamin E. Hermalin, & Michael S. Weisbach. (2010). The Role of Boards of Directors in Corporate Governance: A Conceptual Framework and Survey. Journal of Economic Literature. 48(1). 58–107.1638 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Adams, Renée B. & Daniel Ferreira. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance☆. Journal of Financial Economics. 94(2). 291–309.3945 indexed citations breakdown →
Adams, Renée B. & Hamid Mehran. (2008). Corporate performance, board structure, and their determinants in the banking industry. Econstor (Econstor).48 indexed citations
Adams, Renée B. & Hamid Mehran. (2003). Is Corporate Governance Different for Bank Holding Companies? (Part 2: The Governance of Banks). Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic policy review. 9(1). 123.18 indexed citations
20.
Adams, Renée B. & Hamid Mehran. (2003). Is corporate governance different for bank holding companies. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 9(1). 123–142.309 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.