Thomas C. Mosk

486 total citations · 1 hit paper
10 papers, 284 citations indexed

About

Thomas C. Mosk is a scholar working on Finance, Accounting and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas C. Mosk has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 284 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Finance, 8 papers in Accounting and 3 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Thomas C. Mosk's work include Corporate Finance and Governance (8 papers), Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (8 papers) and Credit Risk and Financial Regulations (4 papers). Thomas C. Mosk is often cited by papers focused on Corporate Finance and Governance (8 papers), Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (8 papers) and Credit Risk and Financial Regulations (4 papers). Thomas C. Mosk collaborates with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and United Kingdom. Thomas C. Mosk's co-authors include Reint Gropp, Steven Ongena, Carlo Wix, Renée B. Adams, Jason Sturgess, José María Liberti and Vasso Ioannidou and has published in prestigious journals such as Review of Financial Studies, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis and Oxford University Press eBooks.

In The Last Decade

Thomas C. Mosk

9 papers receiving 266 citations

Hit Papers

Banks Response to Higher Capital Requirements: Evidence f... 2018 2026 2020 2023 2018 50 100 150 200

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Thomas C. Mosk Switzerland 5 253 142 141 25 14 10 284
Günseli Tümer‐Alkan Netherlands 9 248 1.0× 185 1.3× 105 0.7× 16 0.6× 10 0.7× 26 288
Moez Souissi Canada 6 208 0.8× 71 0.5× 122 0.9× 27 1.1× 10 0.7× 10 239
Natalja von Westernhagen Germany 9 259 1.0× 180 1.3× 140 1.0× 31 1.2× 11 0.8× 24 311
Tümer Kapan United States 10 256 1.0× 157 1.1× 150 1.1× 45 1.8× 7 0.5× 17 304
Patrick E. McCabe United States 10 277 1.1× 83 0.6× 156 1.1× 54 2.2× 19 1.4× 23 314
Peter Raupach Germany 9 261 1.0× 115 0.8× 128 0.9× 25 1.0× 17 1.2× 25 289
Jakub Seidler Czechia 7 333 1.3× 236 1.7× 144 1.0× 43 1.7× 6 0.4× 20 359
Yee Cheng Loon United States 5 246 1.0× 93 0.7× 104 0.7× 25 1.0× 18 1.3× 9 278
Ragnar Juelsrud Germany 9 163 0.6× 92 0.6× 80 0.6× 39 1.6× 7 0.5× 21 189
Ryan Taliaferro United States 7 236 0.9× 135 1.0× 112 0.8× 30 1.2× 43 3.1× 17 259

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas C. Mosk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas C. Mosk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas C. Mosk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas C. Mosk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas C. Mosk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas C. Mosk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas C. Mosk. The network helps show where Thomas C. Mosk may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas C. Mosk

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas C. Mosk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas C. Mosk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas C. Mosk. Thomas C. Mosk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Adams, Renée B. & Thomas C. Mosk. (2023). Dear Congress Member: Letters to Congress and the Shaping of (Financial) Legislation. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
2.
Gropp, Reint, et al.. (2023). Supranational Rules, National Discretion: Increasing Versus Inflating Regulatory Bank Capital?. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 59(2). 830–862. 9 indexed citations
3.
Gropp, Reint, et al.. (2020). Supranational Rules, National Discretion: Increasing Versus Inflating Regulatory Bank Capital?. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
4.
Gropp, Reint, et al.. (2020). Supranational Rules, National Discretion: Increasing versus Inflating Regulatory Bank Capital?. SSRN Electronic Journal. 5 indexed citations
5.
Ioannidou, Vasso, José María Liberti, Thomas C. Mosk, & Jason Sturgess. (2018). Intended and Unintended Consequences of Government Credit Guarantee Programmes. Oxford University Press eBooks.
6.
Gropp, Reint, Thomas C. Mosk, Steven Ongena, & Carlo Wix. (2018). Banks Response to Higher Capital Requirements: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment. Review of Financial Studies. 32(1). 266–299. 237 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Mosk, Thomas C.. (2017). Bargaining with a Bank. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
8.
Gropp, Reint, Thomas C. Mosk, Steven Ongena, & Carlo Wix. (2016). Bank Response to Higher Capital Requirements: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment. SSRN Electronic Journal. 13 indexed citations
9.
Gropp, Reint, Thomas C. Mosk, Steven Ongena, & Carlo Wix. (2016). Bank Response to Higher Capital Requirements: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment. SSRN Electronic Journal. 16 indexed citations
10.
Mosk, Thomas C.. (2012). Bargaining with a Bank. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026