Rebecca Coles

2.2k citations
18 papers · 717 indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 10

Rebecca Coles

17 papers receiving 674 citations

Hit Papers

Conspiracist ideation in Britain and Austria: Evidence of...3992011202620162021100200300

Peers

Rebecca Coles
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Communication 89
  • Health 79
  • Sociology and Political Science 403
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 162
  • Gender Studies 65
Replace Sarah C. Boyle with:
Sarah C. Boyle United States
Susan Owen United States
Wayne E. Hensley United States
Carlee Beth Hawkins United States
Meg E. Wise United States
Jessica Salvatore United States
Chelsea L. Ratcliff United States
Natascha de Hoog Netherlands
Rebecca Hofstein Grady United States
Seo-Koo Yoo South Korea
Rebecca Coles relative to Sarah C. Boyle United States Sarah C. Boyle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.1×
Sarah C. Boyle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rebecca Coles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rebecca Coles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rebecca Coles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rebecca Coles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rebecca Coles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rebecca Coles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rebecca Coles. The network helps show where Rebecca Coles may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rebecca Coles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rebecca Coles Line = papers co-authored together Rebecca Coles links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 20241
2 20194
3 20190
4 20181
5 20182
6 20171
7 201627
8 201632
9 201514
10 201517
11 201331
12 201243
13
Conspiracist ideation in Britain and Austria: Evidence of a monological belief system and associations between individual psychological differences and real‐world and fictitious conspiracy theoriesbreakdown →
2011399
14 201125
15 201043
16 201068
17 20092
18 20067

About Rebecca Coles

Rebecca Coles is a scholar working on Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Urban Studies and Music, having authored 18 papers that have together received 717 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diabetes and associated disorders (4 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (4 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (2 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (2 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (2 papers), Diabetes Treatment and Management (2 papers), Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances (2 papers) and Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (89 citations), Health (79 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (403 citations). Rebecca Coles has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Malaysia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Viren Swami, Adrian Furnham, Stefan Stieger, Jakob Pietschnig, Martin Voracek, Emma Wilson, Pat Thomson, Jadwiga Furmaniak, Ângela Nogueira Neves and Bernard Rees Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Clinica Chimica Acta, Ethnography & Education, Journal of Research in International Education, Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics and Diabetic Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026