Read Montague
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Co-authors
- Karl FristonKlaas Ε. StephanRaymond J. DolanSpyridon SamothrakisRick A. AdamsUlrich KirkSébastien HétuGiuseppe Pagnoni
- Topics
- Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers)Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (4 papers)Deception detection and forensic psychology (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomThailand
In The Last Decade
Read Montague
14 papers receiving 602 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Cognitive Neuroscience 427
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 161
- Social Psychology 108
- Psychiatry and Mental health 90
- Clinical Psychology 75
Countries citing papers authored by Read Montague
This map shows the geographic impact of Read Montague's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Read Montague with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Read Montague more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Read Montague
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Read Montague. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Read Montague. The network helps show where Read Montague may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Read Montague
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Read Montague. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Read Montague based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Read Montague. Read Montague is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | Detecting Mens Rea in the Brain | 3 |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | How Should Justice Policy Treat Young Offenders | 2 |
| 11 | G2i Knowledge Brief: A Knowledge Brief of the MacArthur Foundation Research Network on Law and Neuroscience | 2 |
| 12 | fMRI and Lie Detection | 2 |
| 13 | 318 | |
| 14 | 137 | |
| 15 | 35 | |
| 16 | Your Brain Is (Almost) Perfect: How We Make Decisions | 30 |
| 17 | Why Choose This Book?: How We Make Decisions | 43 |
About Read Montague
Read Montague is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Clinical Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 17 papers that have together received 625 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (4 papers) and Deception detection and forensic psychology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (427 citations), General Decision Sciences (25 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (161 citations). Read Montague has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Thailand. Frequent co-authors include Karl Friston, Klaas Ε. Stephan, Raymond J. Dolan, Spyridon Samothrakis, Rick A. Adams, Ulrich Kirk, Sébastien Hétu, Giuseppe Pagnoni, Deanna M. Barch and Janet Feigenbaum. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Biological Psychiatry and Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.