Janet Feigenbaum

1.6k total citations
36 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Janet Feigenbaum is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Janet Feigenbaum has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Clinical Psychology, 8 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 7 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Janet Feigenbaum's work include Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (15 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (10 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (6 papers). Janet Feigenbaum is often cited by papers focused on Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (15 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (10 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (6 papers). Janet Feigenbaum collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Colombia. Janet Feigenbaum's co-authors include Robin G. Morris, Edmund T. Rolls, Peter Fonagy, Charles E. Polkey, Padmal de Silva, Iona Naismith, Tobias Nolte, P. Read Montague, Paul Bebbington and Alan Jones and has published in prestigious journals such as Behaviour Research and Therapy, Neuropsychologia and Journal of Affective Disorders.

In The Last Decade

Janet Feigenbaum

34 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Janet Feigenbaum United Kingdom 16 605 377 150 142 128 36 1.1k
Stephan Walther Germany 18 678 1.1× 622 1.6× 385 2.6× 166 1.2× 329 2.6× 26 1.4k
Hannah Broadbent United Kingdom 20 744 1.2× 277 0.7× 224 1.5× 87 0.6× 195 1.5× 30 1.2k
Anneliese A. Pontius United States 18 255 0.4× 313 0.8× 331 2.2× 69 0.5× 183 1.4× 68 867
Lukas Heydrich Switzerland 15 143 0.2× 780 2.1× 490 3.3× 526 3.7× 199 1.6× 26 1.4k
Martha L. Glisky United States 14 374 0.6× 459 1.2× 430 2.9× 181 1.3× 253 2.0× 16 1.2k
Ruth Van der Hallen Belgium 14 272 0.4× 1.0k 2.8× 157 1.0× 142 1.0× 176 1.4× 41 1.2k
Paul F. Hill United States 11 147 0.2× 353 0.9× 106 0.7× 74 0.5× 231 1.8× 24 780
Bruce K. Schefft United States 21 211 0.3× 591 1.6× 601 4.0× 213 1.5× 219 1.7× 47 1.3k
Catrin Wielpuetz Germany 6 152 0.3× 447 1.2× 129 0.9× 166 1.2× 186 1.5× 10 772
Inge Volman Netherlands 18 367 0.6× 522 1.4× 96 0.6× 464 3.3× 527 4.1× 26 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Janet Feigenbaum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet Feigenbaum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet Feigenbaum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet Feigenbaum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet Feigenbaum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet Feigenbaum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet Feigenbaum. The network helps show where Janet Feigenbaum may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janet Feigenbaum

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janet Feigenbaum. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janet Feigenbaum based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janet Feigenbaum. Janet Feigenbaum is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Senra, Hugo, Ciarán O’Driscoll, Janet Feigenbaum, et al.. (2025). An exploration of the relationship between ineffective modes of mentalization and difficulties related to borderline personality disorder: A network approach. Journal of Affective Disorders. 374. 225–234.
2.
Saunders, Rob, et al.. (2024). The Psychological Emptiness Scale: a psychometric evaluation. BJPsych Open. 10(2). e42–e42. 6 indexed citations
3.
Lahnakoski, Juha M., Tobias Nolte, Alec Solway, et al.. (2024). A machine-learning approach for differentiating borderline personality disorder from community participants with brain-wide functional connectivity. Journal of Affective Disorders. 360. 345–353. 3 indexed citations
4.
Nolte, Tobias, Terry Lohrenz, Janet Feigenbaum, et al.. (2024). Attachment and borderline personality disorder as the dance unfolds: A quantitative analysis of a novel paradigm. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 175. 470–478. 2 indexed citations
5.
Nolte, Tobias, Janet Feigenbaum, Brooks King‐Casas, et al.. (2022). The mediating role of attachment and mentalising in the relationship between childhood maltreatment, self-harm and suicidality. Child Abuse & Neglect. 128. 105576–105576. 28 indexed citations
6.
Moran, Paul, Tobias Nolte, Janet Feigenbaum, et al.. (2021). Impaired mentalizing in depression and the effects of borderline personality disorder on this relationship. Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation. 8(1). 15–15. 13 indexed citations
7.
8.
9.
Toms, Gill, Lynne Williams, Jo Rycroft‐Malone, Michaela Swales, & Janet Feigenbaum. (2019). The development and theoretical application of an implementation framework for dialectical behaviour therapy: a critical literature review. Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation. 6(1). 2–2. 14 indexed citations
10.
Naismith, Iona, et al.. (2017). Inhibitors and facilitators of compassion‐focused imagery in personality disorder. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy. 25(2). 283–291. 13 indexed citations
11.
Feigenbaum, Janet, et al.. (2011). A real‐world study of the effectiveness of DBT in the UK National Health Service. British Journal of Clinical Psychology. 51(2). 121–141. 75 indexed citations
12.
Keville, Saskia, et al.. (2010). A feasibility study of mindfulness‐based cognitive therapy for individuals with borderline personality disorder. Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice. 84(2). 184–200. 31 indexed citations
13.
Robbins, Ian, et al.. (2006). The long-term impact of war experiences and evacuation on people who were children during World War Two. Aging & Mental Health. 11(2). 168–174. 14 indexed citations
14.
Feigenbaum, Janet & Robin G. Morris. (2004). Allocentric Versus Egocentric Spatial Memory After Unilateral Temporal Lobectomy in Humans.. Neuropsychology. 18(3). 462–472. 77 indexed citations
15.
Feigenbaum, Janet. (2001). Book Reviews. 1(2). 240–241. 1 indexed citations
16.
Feigenbaum, Janet, et al.. (2000). Mental health professionals’ attitudes and practices towards male childhood sexual abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect. 24(3). 391–409. 73 indexed citations
17.
Feigenbaum, Janet. (1997). Haply I may remember and haply may forget. TLS, the Times literary supplement/Times literary supplement on CD-ROM/TLS. Times literary supplement. 8–9.
18.
Morris, Robin G., Alan D. Pickering, Sharon Abrahams, & Janet Feigenbaum. (1996). Space and the hippocampal formation in humans. Brain Research Bulletin. 40(5-6). 487–490. 32 indexed citations
19.
Feigenbaum, Janet. (1996). Handbook of neuropsychology (vol. 4),. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 34(7). 601–601. 13 indexed citations
20.
Feigenbaum, Janet, Charles E. Polkey, & Robin G. Morris. (1996). Deficits in spatial working memory after unilateral temporal lobectomy in man. Neuropsychologia. 34(3). 163–176. 89 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026