Raymond van Ee
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Neural dynamics and brain function
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
-
- Multisensory perception and integration
Papers in
-
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms 111
- Neural dynamics and brain function 47
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies 17
-
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 20
- Co-authors
- Casper J. ErkelensLoes van DamJan W. BrascampGijs Joost BrouwerTomas KnapenRichard van WezelJeroen J. A. van BoxtelA. J. Noest
- Journals
- Journal of Vision (28 papers)Vision Research (28 papers)Perception (10 papers)Journal of Neuroscience (8 papers)PLoS ONE (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsBelgiumUnited States
In The Last Decade
Raymond van Ee
140 papers receiving 4.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 154
- Cognitive Neuroscience 3.8k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.0k
- Sensory Systems 362
- Human-Computer Interaction 296
- Ophthalmology 449
Countries citing papers authored by Raymond van Ee
This map shows the geographic impact of Raymond van Ee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Raymond van Ee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Raymond van Ee more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Raymond van Ee
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Raymond van Ee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Raymond van Ee. The network helps show where Raymond van Ee may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Raymond van Ee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 27 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 60 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 165 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 66 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 45 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 10 | |
| 12 | 2006 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2006 | 51 | |
| 14 | 2006 | 71 | |
| 15 | 2005 | 76 | |
| 16 | 2003 | 14 | |
| 17 | 2000 | 40 | |
| 18 | 1999 | 24 | |
| 19 | 1997 | 36 | |
| 20 | 1996 | 65 |
About Raymond van Ee
Raymond van Ee is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Ophthalmology, Sensory Systems, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 144 papers that have together received 5.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (111 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (47 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (29 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (21 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (20 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (17 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (15 papers) and Color perception and design (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (3.8k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.0k citations), Sensory Systems (362 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (296 citations) and Ophthalmology (449 citations). Raymond van Ee has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and United States. Frequent co-authors include Casper J. Erkelens, Loes van Dam, Jan W. Brascamp, Gijs Joost Brouwer, Tomas Knapen, Richard van Wezel, Jeroen J. A. van Boxtel, A. J. Noest, A. V. van den Berg and Martin S. Banks. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vision, Vision Research, Perception, Journal of Neuroscience and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.