Alexander T. Sack
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.1%
- Neurology top 0.1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 1%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 1%
- Social Psychology top 1%
- Co-authors
- Rainer GoebelTeresa SchuhmannTom A. de GraafFelix DueckerDavid E.J. LindenSanne ten OeverElia FormisanoHeidi I.L. Jacobs
- Topics
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (97 papers)Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (95 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (61 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Alexander T. Sack
238 papers receiving 8.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 157
- Cognitive Neuroscience 6.6k
- Neurology 2.6k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.2k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 1.1k
- Social Psychology 906
Countries citing papers authored by Alexander T. Sack
This map shows the geographic impact of Alexander T. Sack's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alexander T. Sack with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alexander T. Sack more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alexander T. Sack
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alexander T. Sack. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alexander T. Sack. The network helps show where Alexander T. Sack may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alexander T. Sack
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alexander T. Sack. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alexander T. Sack based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Alexander T. Sack. Alexander T. Sack is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | Comparing the Anti-Depressive Effect of Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) Versus Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) in the Treatment of Patients with Depression. | 3 |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 25 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 20 | |
| 17 | 31 | |
| 18 | 21 | |
| 19 | 27 | |
| 20 | 88 |
About Alexander T. Sack
Alexander T. Sack is a scholar working on Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 250 papers that have together received 8.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (97 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (95 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (61 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (6.6k citations), Neurology (2.6k citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.2k citations). Alexander T. Sack has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Rainer Goebel, Teresa Schuhmann, Tom A. de Graaf, Felix Duecker, David E.J. Linden, Sanne ten Oever, Elia Formisano, Heidi I.L. Jacobs, Roi Cohen Kadosh and Nina Bien. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.