Randolph Blake
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.02%
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms 262
- Neural dynamics and brain function 109
- Ophthalmology top 0.2%
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 34
- Social Psychology top 0.1%
- Color perception and design 31
- Sensory Systems top 0.5%
-
- Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies 48
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research 39
-
- Retinal Development and Disorders 30
-
- Color Science and Applications 29
- Co-authors
- Emily D. GrossmanNikos K. LogothetisSang‐Hun LeeRobert A. FoxMaggie ShiffrarDuje TadinJan W. BrascampDavid J. Heeger
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth KoreaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Randolph Blake
317 papers receiving 17.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 167
- Cognitive Neuroscience 15.9k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 2.9k
- Ophthalmology 1.8k
- Social Psychology 3.6k
- Sensory Systems 726
Countries citing papers authored by Randolph Blake
This map shows the geographic impact of Randolph Blake's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Randolph Blake with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Randolph Blake more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Randolph Blake
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Randolph Blake. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Randolph Blake. The network helps show where Randolph Blake may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Randolph Blake, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 36 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 40 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 90 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 59 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 165 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 38 | |
| 16 | 2004 | 192 | |
| 17 | 2003 | 87 | |
| 18 | Binocular Rivalry and Conscious Visual Awareness. | 1997 | 2 |
| 19 | Psychoanatomical strategies for studying human visual perception | 1995 | 8 |
| 20 | 1982 | 12 |
About Randolph Blake
Randolph Blake is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Ophthalmology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 323 papers that have together received 18.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (262 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (109 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (48 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (39 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (34 papers), Color perception and design (31 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (30 papers) and Color Science and Applications (29 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (15.9k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (2.9k citations) and Ophthalmology (1.8k citations). Randolph Blake has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Emily D. Grossman, Nikos K. Logothetis, Sang‐Hun Lee, Robert A. Fox, Maggie Shiffrar, Duje Tadin, Jan W. Brascamp, David J. Heeger, Lee A. Gilroy and Chai-Youn Kim. Their work appears in journals such as Vision Research, Journal of Vision, Perception, Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance and Psychological Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.