Raymond Scupin
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Education
- Human-Computer Interaction top 10%
- Co-authors
- Christopher R. DeCorse
- Topics
- Asian Studies and History (10 papers)Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (9 papers)Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (6 papers)
- Cited by
- Human-Computer InteractionManagement of Technology and InnovationPolitical Science and International Relations
- Partner nations
- United StatesBruneiCanada
In The Last Decade
Raymond Scupin
17 papers receiving 367 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
- Sociology and Political Science 150
- Political Science and International Relations 83
- Social Psychology 63
- Education 41
- Human-Computer Interaction 34
Countries citing papers authored by Raymond Scupin
This map shows the geographic impact of Raymond Scupin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Raymond Scupin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Raymond Scupin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Raymond Scupin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Raymond Scupin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Raymond Scupin. The network helps show where Raymond Scupin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Raymond Scupin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Raymond Scupin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Raymond Scupin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Raymond Scupin. Raymond Scupin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | Peoples and Cultures of Asia | 1 |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | Religion and culture : an anthropological focus | 7 |
| 7 | The Anthropological Perspective on Religion | 2 |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 270 | |
| 10 | Cultural Anthropology: A Global Perspective | 37 |
| 11 | Anthropology: A Global Perspective | 36 |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 28 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About Raymond Scupin
Raymond Scupin is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Anthropology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 438 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Asian Studies and History (10 papers), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (9 papers) and Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (34 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (27 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (83 citations). Raymond Scupin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brunei and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Christopher R. DeCorse. Their work appears in journals such as Human Organization, The Journal of Asian Studies and Language Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.