Kenith V. Sobel

922 total citations
25 papers, 670 citations indexed

About

Kenith V. Sobel is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Statistics and Probability. According to data from OpenAlex, Kenith V. Sobel has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 670 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 10 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 6 papers in Statistics and Probability. Recurrent topics in Kenith V. Sobel's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (15 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (10 papers) and Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (6 papers). Kenith V. Sobel is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (15 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (10 papers) and Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (6 papers). Kenith V. Sobel collaborates with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Germany. Kenith V. Sobel's co-authors include Randolph Blake, Thomas W. James, Kyle R. Cave, Duje Tadin, Sang Chul Chong, Lee A. Gilroy, Amrita Puri, Michael J. Kane, Thomas J. Faulkenberry and Matthew D. Pickard and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Neuron and Psychological Science.

In The Last Decade

Kenith V. Sobel

22 papers receiving 638 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kenith V. Sobel United States 11 582 217 95 52 52 25 670
Irene Sperandio United Kingdom 14 615 1.1× 126 0.6× 90 0.9× 27 0.5× 26 0.5× 47 680
Josée Rivest Canada 10 671 1.2× 281 1.3× 95 1.0× 125 2.4× 30 0.6× 18 758
Mauro Manassi United States 19 971 1.7× 198 0.9× 87 0.9× 160 3.1× 39 0.8× 45 1.1k
Brian Barton United States 11 886 1.5× 190 0.9× 114 1.2× 62 1.2× 19 0.4× 27 1.0k
Ramakrishna Chakravarthi United Kingdom 15 670 1.2× 111 0.5× 74 0.8× 89 1.7× 40 0.8× 40 743
David H. Peterzell United States 14 613 1.1× 140 0.6× 260 2.7× 29 0.6× 28 0.5× 44 753
J. A. Solomon United Kingdom 6 886 1.5× 176 0.8× 129 1.4× 211 4.1× 32 0.6× 7 962
Bilge Sayim France 20 1.1k 1.9× 198 0.9× 165 1.7× 216 4.2× 36 0.7× 56 1.2k
Kyriaki Mikellidou Italy 12 517 0.9× 146 0.7× 69 0.7× 23 0.4× 28 0.5× 20 581
Andrew M. Herbert United States 15 571 1.0× 182 0.8× 157 1.7× 74 1.4× 11 0.2× 32 778

Countries citing papers authored by Kenith V. Sobel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kenith V. Sobel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kenith V. Sobel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kenith V. Sobel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kenith V. Sobel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kenith V. Sobel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kenith V. Sobel. The network helps show where Kenith V. Sobel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kenith V. Sobel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kenith V. Sobel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kenith V. Sobel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kenith V. Sobel. Kenith V. Sobel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Sobel, Kenith V., et al.. (2024). Graduate Admissions in Psychology Before and After the Pandemic: GRExit Comes to Psychology. Teaching of Psychology. 52(2). 204–209. 1 indexed citations
2.
Smith, Mary, et al.. (2022). The Classic Stroop Asymmetry in Online Experiments. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research. 27(2). 133–144.
3.
Sobel, Kenith V., et al.. (2021). Set size and ensemble perception of numerical value. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 83(3). 1169–1178. 2 indexed citations
4.
Sobel, Kenith V., et al.. (2020). Visual search inverts the classic Stroop asymmetry. Acta Psychologica. 205. 103054–103054. 8 indexed citations
5.
Sobel, Kenith V., et al.. (2018). The Size Congruity Effect in Visual Search: Further Evidence for Late Interaction. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research. 23(4). 311–318. 1 indexed citations
6.
Sobel, Kenith V. & Amrita Puri. (2018). Size congruity influences visual search via the target template. Acta Psychologica. 183. 66–74. 6 indexed citations
7.
Sobel, Kenith V., Amrita Puri, & Thomas J. Faulkenberry. (2016). Bottom-up and top-down attentional contributions to the size congruity effect. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 78(5). 1324–1336. 19 indexed citations
8.
Sobel, Kenith V., et al.. (2016). Visual search for conjunctions of physical and numerical size shows that they are processed independently.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 43(3). 444–453. 18 indexed citations
9.
Sobel, Kenith V., et al.. (2014). Target grouping in visual search for multiple digits. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 77(1). 67–77. 8 indexed citations
10.
Koldewyn, Kami, et al.. (2014). Individuals with autism experience stronger visual capture by shape singletons than neurotypicals. Journal of Vision. 14(10). 677–677.
11.
Blake, R. & Kenith V. Sobel. (2010). Motion prolongs perceptual dominance during binocular rivalry. Journal of Vision. 3(9). 50–50.
12.
Sobel, Kenith V., et al.. (2009). Using feature preview to investigate the roles of top–down and bottom–up processing in conjunction search. Acta Psychologica. 132(1). 22–30. 12 indexed citations
13.
Sobel, Kenith V., et al.. (2007). Individual differences in working memory capacity and visual search: The roles of top-down and bottom-up processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 14(5). 840–845. 66 indexed citations
14.
Blake, Randolph, et al.. (2006). Strength of early visual adaptation depends on visual awareness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 103(12). 4783–4788. 154 indexed citations
15.
Blake, Randolph, Kenith V. Sobel, & Thomas W. James. (2004). Neural Synergy Between Kinetic Vision and Touch. Psychological Science. 15(6). 397–402. 140 indexed citations
16.
Blake, Randolph, Kenith V. Sobel, & Lee A. Gilroy. (2003). Visual Motion Retards Alternations between Conflicting Perceptual Interpretations. Neuron. 39(5). 869–878. 87 indexed citations
17.
Sobel, Kenith V. & Randolph Blake. (2003). Subjective contours and binocular rivalry suppression. Vision Research. 43(14). 1533–1540. 18 indexed citations
18.
Sobel, Kenith V. & Kyle R. Cave. (2002). Roles of salience and strategy in conjunction search.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 28(5). 1055–1070. 38 indexed citations
19.
Sobel, Kenith V. & Randolph Blake. (2002). How Context Influences Predominance during Binocular Rivalry. Perception. 31(7). 813–824. 56 indexed citations
20.
Sobel, Kenith V. & Kyle R. Cave. (2002). Roles of salience and strategy in conjunction search.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 28(5). 1055–1070. 25 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Irene Sperandio Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Josée Rivest Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mauro Manassi Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Brian Barton Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ramakrishna Chakravarthi Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by David H. Peterzell Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by J. A. Solomon Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Bilge Sayim Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kyriaki Mikellidou Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Andrew M. Herbert
Rankless by CCL
2026