Jocelyn L. Sy

576 total citations
22 papers, 375 citations indexed

About

Jocelyn L. Sy is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Ophthalmology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Jocelyn L. Sy has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 375 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 3 papers in Ophthalmology and 2 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Jocelyn L. Sy's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (17 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (14 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (10 papers). Jocelyn L. Sy is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (17 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (14 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (10 papers). Jocelyn L. Sy collaborates with scholars based in United States, Denmark and Australia. Jocelyn L. Sy's co-authors include Barry Giesbrecht, Randolph Blake, Frank Tong, Scott A. Guerin, Kevin C. Dieter, J. C. Elliott, Søren Kyllingsbæk, Young Eun Park, Sang Wook Hong and Claus Bundesen and has published in prestigious journals such as NeuroImage, Journal of Neurophysiology and Psychological Science.

In The Last Decade

Jocelyn L. Sy

22 papers receiving 370 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jocelyn L. Sy United States 10 335 43 41 31 30 22 375
Jared Abrams United States 7 421 1.3× 56 1.3× 92 2.2× 25 0.8× 20 0.7× 14 478
Juraj Mesík United States 8 252 0.8× 29 0.7× 36 0.9× 20 0.6× 13 0.4× 16 280
Anna Kosovicheva United States 12 340 1.0× 79 1.8× 80 2.0× 37 1.2× 20 0.7× 36 439
Elena Betta Italy 8 370 1.1× 42 1.0× 52 1.3× 9 0.3× 31 1.0× 9 400
Sofia Crespi Italy 10 348 1.0× 24 0.6× 36 0.9× 28 0.9× 20 0.7× 23 417
Kyriaki Mikellidou Italy 12 517 1.5× 69 1.6× 146 3.6× 27 0.9× 9 0.3× 20 581
Ariella V. Popple United States 11 378 1.1× 30 0.7× 42 1.0× 106 3.4× 23 0.8× 20 394
M. Carrasco United States 3 408 1.2× 57 1.3× 66 1.6× 23 0.7× 13 0.4× 12 429
Craig Aaen‐Stockdale Canada 13 386 1.2× 40 0.9× 101 2.5× 111 3.6× 33 1.1× 24 454
Ramakrishna Chakravarthi United Kingdom 15 670 2.0× 74 1.7× 111 2.7× 20 0.6× 13 0.4× 40 743

Countries citing papers authored by Jocelyn L. Sy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jocelyn L. Sy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jocelyn L. Sy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jocelyn L. Sy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jocelyn L. Sy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jocelyn L. Sy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jocelyn L. Sy. The network helps show where Jocelyn L. Sy may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jocelyn L. Sy

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jocelyn L. Sy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jocelyn L. Sy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jocelyn L. Sy. Jocelyn L. Sy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Sy, Jocelyn L., et al.. (2021). Conscious perception can be both graded and discrete.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 150(8). 1461–1475. 6 indexed citations
3.
Sun, Hongyang, et al.. (2020). Increase in internetwork functional connectivity in the human brain with attention capture. Journal of Neurophysiology. 124(6). 1885–1899. 3 indexed citations
4.
Sy, Jocelyn L., et al.. (2018). The emotional attentional blink is robust to divided attention. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 81(1). 205–216. 5 indexed citations
5.
Sy, Jocelyn L., et al.. (2017). Distributional analyses of individual differences in binocular rivalry dynamics. Journal of Vision. 17(10). 582–582. 2 indexed citations
6.
Park, Young Eun, Jocelyn L. Sy, Sang Wook Hong, & Frank Tong. (2017). Reprioritization of Features of Multidimensional Objects Stored in Visual Working Memory. Psychological Science. 28(12). 1773–1785. 37 indexed citations
7.
Dieter, Kevin C., Jocelyn L. Sy, & Randolph Blake. (2016). Individual differences in sensory eye dominance reflected in the dynamics of binocular rivalry. Vision Research. 141. 40–50. 40 indexed citations
8.
Pratte, Michael S., Jocelyn L. Sy, Jascha D. Swisher, & Frank Tong. (2015). Radial bias is not necessary for orientation decoding. NeuroImage. 127. 23–33. 22 indexed citations
9.
Park, Young Eun, Jocelyn L. Sy, & Frank Tong. (2015). Reprioritization of features of multi-dimensional objects stored in visual working memory. Journal of Vision. 15(12). 1118–1118. 3 indexed citations
10.
Sy, Jocelyn L., et al.. (2014). Accurate expectancies diminish perceptual distraction during visual search. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 8. 334–334. 5 indexed citations
11.
Giesbrecht, Barry, Jocelyn L. Sy, Claus Bundesen, & Søren Kyllingsbæk. (2014). A new perspective on the perceptual selectivity of attention under load. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1316(1). 71–86. 29 indexed citations
12.
Sy, Jocelyn L., J. C. Elliott, & Barry Giesbrecht. (2013). Post-perceptual processing during the attentional blink is modulated by inter-trial task expectancies. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 7. 627–627. 9 indexed citations
13.
Giesbrecht, Barry, Jocelyn L. Sy, & Scott A. Guerin. (2012). Both memory and attention systems contribute to visual search for targets cued by implicitly learned context. Vision Research. 85. 80–89. 50 indexed citations
14.
Eckstein, Miguel P., Koel Das, Binh T. Pham, et al.. (2011). Neural decoding of collective wisdom with multi-brain computing. NeuroImage. 59(1). 94–108. 41 indexed citations
15.
Kyllingsbæk, Søren, Jocelyn L. Sy, & Barry Giesbrecht. (2010). Understanding the allocation of attention when faced with varying perceptual load in partial report: A computational approach. Neuropsychologia. 49(6). 1487–1497. 23 indexed citations
16.
Peterson, Matthew, Koel Das, Jocelyn L. Sy, et al.. (2010). Ideal observer analysis for task normalization of pattern classifier performance applied to EEG and fMRI data. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 27(12). 2670–2670. 1 indexed citations
17.
Giesbrecht, Barry, et al.. (2008). Personal names do not always survive the attentional blink: Behavioral evidence for a flexible locus of selection. Vision Research. 49(10). 1378–1388. 28 indexed citations
18.
Sy, Jocelyn L. & Barry Giesbrecht. (2008). Target–target similarity and the attentional blink: Task-relevance matters!. Visual Cognition. 17(3). 307–317. 7 indexed citations
19.
Giesbrecht, Barry, Jocelyn L. Sy, & J. C. Elliott. (2007). Electrophysiological Evidence for Both Perceptual and Postperceptual Selection during the Attentional Blink. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 19(12). 2005–2018. 39 indexed citations
20.
Giesbrecht, Barry, Jocelyn L. Sy, & J. C. Elliott. (2007). Electrophysiological Evidence for Both Perceptual and Postperceptual Selection during the Attentional Blink. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. Early Access(Early Access). 2010941425–14. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026