Rachel Gooden
About
In The Last Decade
Rachel Gooden
6 papers receiving 162 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 56
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 43
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 33
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 32
- Developmental Neuroscience 30
Countries citing papers authored by Rachel Gooden
This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel Gooden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel Gooden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel Gooden more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel Gooden
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel Gooden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel Gooden. The network helps show where Rachel Gooden may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachel Gooden
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachel Gooden. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachel Gooden based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rachel Gooden. Rachel Gooden is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.