Rachel Feuer
About
In The Last Decade
Rachel Feuer
8 papers receiving 341 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Physiology 145
- Molecular Biology 103
- Education 97
- Cancer Research 55
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 49
Countries citing papers authored by Rachel Feuer
This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel Feuer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel Feuer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel Feuer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel Feuer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel Feuer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel Feuer. The network helps show where Rachel Feuer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachel Feuer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachel Feuer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachel Feuer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rachel Feuer. Rachel Feuer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 29 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | Voices from the Community: A Case for Reciprocity in Service-Learning. | 73 |
| 4 | 42 | |
| 5 | 86 | |
| 6 | 42 | |
| 7 | 37 | |
| 8 | 61 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.