Barbara Sarter

18 papers receiving 534 citations

Peers

Barbara Sarter
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Research and Theory 26
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 12
  • General Psychology 5
  • General Health Professions 89
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 54
Replace Huijun Zhang with:
Huijun Zhang China
Linda Kim United States
İnsaf Altun Türkiye
Krystyna Kowalczuk Poland
Mohammad Aghajani Iran
Venetia Notara Greece
Jeonghyun Kim South Korea
Lifen Wu Taiwan
Sophia M. Schild United States
Heewon Lee United States
Barbara Sarter relative to Huijun Zhang China Huijun Zhang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Huijun Zhang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Barbara Sarter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Barbara Sarter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Barbara Sarter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Barbara Sarter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Barbara Sarter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Barbara Sarter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Barbara Sarter. The network helps show where Barbara Sarter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Barbara Sarter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Barbara Sarter Line = papers co-authored together Barbara Sarter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1
Paths to knowledge: innovative research methods for nursing.
1988148
2 200287
3 201472
4 200567
5
Love and work: oncology nurses' view of the meaning of their work.
199344
6 198840
7 201027
8 201423
9 198717
10 201415
11
The stream of becoming: a study of Martha Rogers's theory.
19879
12 19896
13 20216
14
Brief case reports of medically supervised, water-only fasting associated with remission of autoimmune disease.
20025
15 20143
16 20122
17
Breast cancer prevention with grape seed phytochemicals
20051
18 19871

About Barbara Sarter

Barbara Sarter is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Pharmacology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 573 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (2 papers), Ethics in medical practice (2 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (1 paper), Folate and B Vitamins Research (1 paper), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (1 paper), Fatty Acid Research and Health (1 paper), Coenzyme Q10 studies and effects (1 paper) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (26 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (12 citations), General Psychology (5 citations), General Health Professions (89 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (54 citations). Barbara Sarter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Singapore and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Todd A. Schwartz, Kristine Kelsey, William S. Harris, Tiffany I. Long, Peter W. Laird, Woon‐Puay Koh, Mimi C. Yu, Joel Fuhrman, Dale Glaser and Iris R. Bell. Their work appears in journals such as Global Advances in Health and Medicine, Nursing Science Quarterly, Nutrition Journal, The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing and Human Genetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact