Rachel Ebling

487 total citations
9 papers, 329 citations indexed

About

Rachel Ebling is a scholar working on Demography, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Rachel Ebling has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 329 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Demography, 4 papers in Social Psychology and 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Rachel Ebling's work include Family Dynamics and Relationships (5 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (3 papers) and Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (2 papers). Rachel Ebling is often cited by papers focused on Family Dynamics and Relationships (5 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (3 papers) and Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (2 papers). Rachel Ebling collaborates with scholars based in United States. Rachel Ebling's co-authors include Robert W. Levenson, José A. Soto, Marsha Kline Pruett, Glendessa M. Insabella, Philip A. Cowan, Kyle D. Pruett, Samantha C. Holmes, Laura S. Callinan and Megan V. Smith and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Marriage and the Family, Psychiatric Services and Emotion.

In The Last Decade

Rachel Ebling

9 papers receiving 282 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Rachel Ebling United States	7	140	132	127	102	44	9	329
Dana Royce Baerger United States	6	180 1.3×	140 1.1×	46 0.4×	216 2.1×	41 0.9×	8	448
I.E. van der Valk Netherlands	8	147 1.1×	144 1.1×	118 0.9×	166 1.6×	22 0.5×	14	354
W. Robert Nay United States	11	109 0.8×	118 0.9×	104 0.8×	212 2.1×	52 1.2×	17	412
Charles Keith United States	8	131 0.9×	84 0.6×	140 1.1×	231 2.3×	15 0.3×	20	429
Carol Cronin Weisfeld United States	14	178 1.3×	240 1.8×	79 0.6×	100 1.0×	184 4.2×	26	466
Margaret Stanley Hagan United States	6	151 1.1×	116 0.9×	190 1.5×	195 1.9×	85 1.9×	8	374
Paulina F. Kernberg United States	11	92 0.7×	84 0.6×	61 0.5×	380 3.7×	22 0.5×	28	502
Ann M. Minnett United States	10	76 0.5×	67 0.5×	84 0.7×	129 1.3×	102 2.3×	10	329
J. Kelly McCoy United States	6	106 0.8×	98 0.7×	188 1.5×	262 2.6×	144 3.3×	7	385
Mehmet Harma Türkiye	10	134 1.0×	219 1.7×	46 0.4×	140 1.4×	38 0.9×	28	378

Countries citing papers authored by Rachel Ebling

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel Ebling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel Ebling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel Ebling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel Ebling

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel Ebling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel Ebling. The network helps show where Rachel Ebling may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachel Ebling

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachel Ebling. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachel Ebling based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rachel Ebling. Rachel Ebling is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Smith, Megan V., et al.. (2021). Improving Maternal Mental Health as a Pathway to Economic Mobility in the TANF System. Psychiatric Services. 72(10). 1139–1144. 1 indexed citations

2.

Pruett, Marsha Kline, Rachel Ebling, & Philip A. Cowan. (2011). Pathways From A Us Co-Parenting Intervention To Legal Outcomes. International Journal of Law Policy and the Family. 25(1). 24–45. 7 indexed citations

3.

Ebling, Rachel, Kyle D. Pruett, & Marsha Kline Pruett. (2009). “GET OVER IT”: PERSPECTIVES ON DIVORCE FROM YOUNG CHILDREN*. Family Court Review. 47(4). 665–681. 4 indexed citations

4.

Pruett, Marsha Kline, et al.. (2007). The Hand That Rocks the Cradle: Maternal Gatekeeping after Divorce. Pace law review. 27(4). 709–709. 38 indexed citations

5.

Soto, José A., Robert W. Levenson, & Rachel Ebling. (2005). Cultures of Moderation and Expression: Emotional Experience, Behavior, and Physiology in Chinese Americans and Mexican Americans.. Emotion. 5(2). 154–165. 167 indexed citations

6.

Pruett, Marsha Kline, Rachel Ebling, & Glendessa M. Insabella. (2004). CRITICAL ASPECTS OF PARENTING PLANS FOR YOUNG CHILDREN. Family Court Review. 42(1). 39–59. 50 indexed citations

7.

Pruett, Marsha Kline, Rachel Ebling, & Glendessa M. Insabella. (2004). Critical Aspects of Parenting Plans for Young Children: Interjecting Data into the Debate about Overnights. Family Court Review. 42(1). 39–59. 29 indexed citations

8.

Ebling, Rachel & Robert W. Levenson. (2003). Who Are the Marital Experts?. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 65(1). 130–142. 17 indexed citations

9.

Levenson, Robert W., et al.. (2003). Predicting Husbands' and Wives' Retirement Satisfaction from the Emotional Qualities of Marital Interaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 20(3). 335–354. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact