Dana Royce Baerger
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Demography top 10%
- Co-authors
- Dan P. McAdamsJohn S. LyonsPamela K. AdelmannPeter QuigleyJonathan W. GouldRobert M. Galatzer‐LevyKaren S. Budd
- Topics
- Child Abuse and Trauma (2 papers)Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (2 papers)Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Neuropsychology and Physiological PsychologyDevelopmental and Educational PsychologyClinical Psychology
- Journals
- Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsProfessional Psychology Research and PracticeNarrative Inquiry
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Dana Royce Baerger
8 papers receiving 403 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Clinical Psychology 216
- Sociology and Political Science 180
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 161
- Social Psychology 140
- Demography 46
Countries citing papers authored by Dana Royce Baerger
This map shows the geographic impact of Dana Royce Baerger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dana Royce Baerger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dana Royce Baerger more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dana Royce Baerger
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dana Royce Baerger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dana Royce Baerger. The network helps show where Dana Royce Baerger may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dana Royce Baerger
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dana Royce Baerger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dana Royce Baerger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dana Royce Baerger. Dana Royce Baerger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Competency to stand trial in preadjudicated and petitioned juvenile defendants. | 23 |
| 2 | A Methodology for Reviewing the Reliability and Relevance of Child Custody Evaluations | 7 |
| 3 | Problems in acquisition and use of clinical information in juvenile court: One jurisdiction’s response | 5 |
| 4 | 19 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 74 | |
| 7 | 268 | |
| 8 | 51 |
About Dana Royce Baerger
Dana Royce Baerger is a scholar working on Pharmacy, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 8 papers that have together received 448 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Abuse and Trauma (2 papers), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (2 papers) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (21 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (161 citations) and Clinical Psychology (216 citations). Dana Royce Baerger has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Dan P. McAdams, John S. Lyons, Pamela K. Adelmann, Peter Quigley, Jonathan W. Gould, Robert M. Galatzer‐Levy and Karen S. Budd. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Professional Psychology Research and Practice and Narrative Inquiry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.