Rachel Curtis
- Applied Psychology top 1%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions 8
- Health Informatics top 5%
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Mobile Health and mHealth Applications 18
- Physiology top 5%
- Physical Activity and Health 21
-
- Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet 12
-
- Impact of Technology on Adolescents 11
-
- Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction 10
-
- Health disparities and outcomes 9
-
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors 8
- Co-authors
- Carol MaherTim D. WindsorTim OldsJillian RyanSarah EdneyRonald C. PlotnikoffTy FergusonRosa Virgara
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Rachel Curtis
53 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 151
- Applied Psychology 469
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 93
- Health Informatics 39
- General Health Professions 660
- Physiology 639
Countries citing papers authored by Rachel Curtis
This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel Curtis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel Curtis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel Curtis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel Curtis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel Curtis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel Curtis. The network helps show where Rachel Curtis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rachel Curtis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 10 | Effectiveness of wearable activity trackers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review of systematic reviews and meta-analysesbreakdown → | 2022 | 245 |
| 11 | 2022 | 20 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 38 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 18 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 42 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 49 | |
| 17 | 2020 | 92 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 75 | |
| 19 | 2019 | 12 | |
| 20 | Can Smartphone Apps Increase Physical Activity? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysisbreakdown → | 2018 | 304 |
About Rachel Curtis
Rachel Curtis is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Applied Psychology and Health, having authored 61 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physical Activity and Health (21 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (18 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (12 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (11 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (10 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (9 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (8 papers) and Digital Mental Health Interventions (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (469 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (93 citations) and Health Informatics (39 citations). Rachel Curtis has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Carol Maher, Tim D. Windsor, Tim Olds, Jillian Ryan, Sarah Edney, Ronald C. Plotnikoff, Ty Ferguson, Rosa Virgara, Dorothea Dumuid and Alyson Crozier. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and FEBS Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.